This article is worded in a funny way. It seems to say, of course we understand and sympathize with Michelle's decision, what with her well-documented back problems and all. But what's this guy Plushenko trying to pull?
BTW and OT, the Toronto Globe and Mail gives the best ice skating coverage of any daily newspaper around. I pick one up at the bookstore every Sunday, since the Detroit papers hardly treat ice skating as a sport at all, especially the Detroit News
Hockeyfan, I don't think the two statements:
"I'm pulling out of the GP series because I tested my back trying the layback position in a combo spin at Campbell's, and found I'm too injured to do all eight revolutions in the SP,"
and
"This strategy for skipping GP has worked for me in the past."
are incompatible or all that far apart. What has worked for her in the past is reducing wear and tear on her body and reducing the risk of injury and muscle strain by cutting back on her performance schedule. Yes, she could have given a longer statement to the USFSA. But in retrospect, we should have paid more attention to statements like this one from Golden Skate's own archives (October 2, at Campbell's):
"I haven't done a layback in a few weeks [due to the pain]. Here, tonight, I had to do the layback, and 'Whoa!' Its hard with the new system to be doing them because you have to do like four different positions. You're grabbing your leg, twisting and moving this way and that. It takes a long time to get used to."
I think saying "Whoa, that hurts!" is pretty forthcoming on Michelle's part, and should put an end to silly speculation about conspiracy theories and ulterior motives.
As for doing the Marshall's event in December, she can take it easy on her spins and continue to rest and heal.
Mathman