And with that, you are painting all Kwan fans, even "the most tolerant Kwan fan", with the same brush. You are saying that we, as Kwan fans, will be less tolerant and more biased quicker than a "nonfan" or a fan of another skater. It might interest you to know that for some of us this is lacking in factual value. Some of us "Kwan fans" are actually Cohenites, Slutskayians, etc, besides Kwanatics/Kwaniacs (whatever the word for Kwan fans is these days). You are as fanatical and adamant in your nonfanism as SOME Kwan fans are in their fanism. I will be a fan of figure skating after Kwan retires just like I was before she ever showed up on the ice. It might interest you to know that the first time I saw Kwan, I really didn't care too much for her skating. It seemed like it was all jumps to me.
Regardless of what you think of those few Kwan fans who jump at every wrong word, written or spoken), you shouldn't paint all of us with that paintbrush. I didn't respond over at Mercury News because, quite frankly, I found nothing that off beat or wrong in what Ann Killian wrote. I found more negativity coming out of "nonfans" of Kwan than I did out of Kwan fans. And yes, I found negativity out of some of the more vocal Kwan fans. It bothers me that some people have to bombard a sports journalist at a newspaper who isn't nationally known over such a silly side comment. And side comment is what it was. What bothers me even more is that the anti-whatevers had to take the opportunity to insult Kwan fans and Kwan herself for no apparent reason. But that will happen no matter what a journalist writes about. It's always going to affect someone somewhere either positively or negatively.