Much like Wagner's nonsense? Agreed. If she can voice an opinion, so can I. Feel free to do so yourself.
I will never understand why so many skating fans are so positively determined to hate Ashley Wagner and anything and everything she says or does.
I am not determined to hate Ashley Wagner based on everything she says or does. But as a public figure, she will absolutely get flack for voicing her opinions
in the wrong way. I couldn't care less about her "furious" remarks, because she had the right to be furious with her PCS scores at Nationals (though, of course, nothing about the tech calls that she didn't get. Why? Seems like a double standard to me, much like the posters here are claiming her dissenters here have.). Much like with fame come people who will defend her, there will be dissenters. I just happen to be someone who takes issue with the way she voices her opinions.
Here's something I considered horrific:
https://twitter.com/AshWagner2010/status/966910244474376192
Tweeted right after the US ladies bombed at the Olympics, I believe. Please feel free to read the first reply to it, and her response.
Here's another two:
https://twitter.com/AshWagner2010/status/965140476893413376
https://twitter.com/AshWagner2010/status/965138246903545856
When she was hardly getting "absolutely hurtful" words for voicing her opinions, more the way she was voicing them, and the way she kept avoiding the tweets at her about Nathan's and Vincent's programs. She kept going after Boyang, instead of tweeting fully formed, even, objective opinions about all skaters. Of course she got some flack! How is what she tweeted "self-awareness"? Seemed like she was supporting skaters from the US, and decided to go after their competitor. "Understandable", but trying to paint what was happening the way she did in that second tweet -- awareness that is not.
And the first tweet:
Oh, if only it were so simple.
It's even "funnier" when you consider that she first went after Boyang's SP for crossovers. His SP wasn't the program that had a lack of transitions, though not the most complex or difficult ones, sure. So her opinion wasn't even valuable or informative. Just plainly wrong. And if she's done it before with him, then this seems even stupider to not recognize there have been changes that have been made. Or is she determined to not see them, for some reason?
https://twitter.com/AshWagner2010/status/964369428950364161
If she was tweeting to be considered an objective, knowledgeable voice, she failed. Of course, she could just have been tweeting just to show support. But then, of course people called her out on picking one person out to constantly criticize, and then ultimately say this:
https://twitter.com/AshWagner2010/status/964726535910342656
About Zagitova: Sure, she backloaded. If, again, Wagner wanted to be considered a knowledgeable or useful voice, she could have tweeted properly about what exactly was wrong about her programs, and why backoading makes for poor programs, or perhaps why Zagitova shouldn't be getting a bonus for her jumps. This was made even worse in some people's eyes when they considered that Wagner and Zagitova were direct competitors. It's really not about the opinion here, for me, and competitors can criticize others' work, but it's the way she voiced it.
It's just a double-standard. For some reason, World medalists can't say on social media what fans without any skating skills or experience say basically every other post on here.
Or, you know, they'll get called out on their wrong/poorly voiced opinions, when posters here see something wrong. It's how conversation works.
Welp, isn't this witch hunting at its finest. Seriously guys in 2018 one would think we were pass such sexist ways. I just love how male skaters can be blunt about what they think and no one bats an eyelash, but suddenly a lady is anything less than perfect and gracious and oh my, she is a horrible human being.
Was Evgeni Plushencko a woman when he got flack for his "platinum medal" comment? Was Patrick Chan a woman when he... well there's a lot of stuff that he's said that's rubbed people the wrong way, I think.
It's not that difficult to understand criticism against Ashley Wagner. But let me draw a (perhaps not the best) comparison: If Wagner were instead a famous scientist tweeting opinions about other people's work the way she did, would she get flack? If she tried to say something wrong, and then pass off criticism as "hurtful words", is that something that would be taken to kindly? On the other hand, if she did it more respectfully, would people simply engage in a discourse with her?
Her getting criticism for it isn't the "tone police" coming after her, it's simply people disagreeing with her in the same way she voices her opinions. It's hardly a revolutionary concept, it's not her getting hate for "being herself". But then she goes ahead and tweets stuff about getting hated on. Her fame shouldn't be a safeguard against criticism. But Twitter has unfortunately given people an excuse to just paint all criticism as "hate". She shouldn't be getting called names, and the sexist remarks need to go, but seriously,
no.