- Joined
- Jul 31, 2003
Zuranthium said:There is nothing she could do that Midori Ito couldn't do better.
Midori should have 100% of the votes here.
Some posters may not be that familiar with Midori ( they may have voted for younger skaters).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zuranthium said:There is nothing she could do that Midori Ito couldn't do better.
Midori should have 100% of the votes here.
That goes beyond polls. Young posters have no idea how much the earlier skaters contributed to figure skating and how well they peformed for their era of skating. Even when they see skaters from the 50s and 60s in film clips they compare them to Mao and Yu na. That's the way the mind works.Vash01 said:Some posters may not be that familiar with Midori ( they may have voted for younger skaters).
It really was monumental performance - first 3Lz, first (?) 3F, first 3x3 and first 7 triple program seen at the Olympics - all in one programme. She was foot perfect and really, should have had straight 6.0s for Technical Components on this occasion. Other than Liz Manley's great free, I felt the rest of the ladies' competition was an anti-climax after Midori as, personally, I was not excited by the "Battle of the Carmens" and knew none of the last flight would bring that level of technical content to the competition. 
Mafke said:I don't understand how anyone can not vote for Ito here.
In terms of number of jumps completed, the quality of the jumps and in being the first to land certain jumps she was just off the charts. No one was in her class as a jumper when she was competing (the closest was Yamaguchi but as consistent as she was with toe jumps her edge jumps were kind of iffy).
