: As you had to get used to the Olympic games result. I still find it hard to put into words what do I feel about your placement. I realize with the state of your legs the bronze was the best you could had hoped for. On the other hand it's not for the bronze you went to Vancouver..
MS: No, not the bronze. Hence I have mixed feelings about the medal. It was a hard thing to get. From that perspective our participating the Olympics is a huge win. But we were going for the gold. We were fighting for the gold.
V: Really?
MS: Yes. It became clear we don't have a chance after the Original Dance.
V: It is probably hard to be objective while in the middle of the competition compared to the outside glance. But let me remark: it was obvious for the outsiders that the first two places will be decided between the Canadians Virtue-Moir and the Americans Davis-White.
MS: I disagree. Oh yes, the Canadians - they are brilliant and it's obvious, even though am not overwhelmed by their programmes. If Oxana and I didn't have to make changes in the programmes according to my leg's state I don't think Virtue/Moir had a chance to beat us. What the Americans showed doesn't look like and ice dance to me at all. I can only see the kids who are running fast across the ice and do some acrobatics. If I were a judge at the Original I would put them outside the top 3.
This was an interview from June 2010, and I was referring to comments attributed to him at the Olympics, and which where taken out of context. I don't recall Shabalin making any actual unsportsmanlike comments at the Olympics. And he was not the only one whose comments were misrepresented at the time; Massimo Scali also ran into, shall we say, an overzealous reporter, in the mixed zone after the FD. As for the interview itself - Russian interviews are always interesting! Not canned answers there... obviously DomShabs were greatly handicapped by his injury, though I'm sure V/M didn't have an easy time of it health-wise, either. I do kind of wonder what DomShabs' programs would have been like had his knee been in better shape; would they really have done such a ridiculous OD? As for his thoughts about D/W - I can't say I haven't expressed similar opinions at times, though obviously my status is rather different than his. I'm not sure how I feel about it; not everyone's obliged to appreciate D/W, and in addition, he was retired by then; I don't have as big an issue with critical comments when skaters aren't going head to head anymore. That having been said, he probably should have toned it down. BTW, going into the Olympics, there were quite a few comments from several of the men about how they were being underscored, their opponents overscored, their opponents had mediocre programs, the judges had it in for them etc., but I don't recall anything like that in the other disciplines.Here's a translation of the interview:
http://www.fsuniverse.net/forum/archive/index.php/t-73964.html
(Olympic videos vanish off youtube)
I can tell which OD I think looks more like a dance.
DW OD was Bollywood movie dance I am not sure about real traditional Indian dance and I beleive there is a difference but his comments are way more true about Davis and White free dance which was not dance at all in any way.
Re US commentating:
OTOH, Dick Button totally adored B&S. And G&G. And for that matter G&P. Ans Shen & Zhao...If some team or skater was having a great performance, Dick was over the moon happy, regardless of country. More over the moon if it were a US skater, but still he wasn't hating on great performances.
IN fact, that's why with all his verbal gaffes, I still like Dick as a commentator a lot better than Scotty. He has his biases (like for a particular position in the layback versus other positions) but he is not as US-centric as Scotty. Or perhaps NBC is more US-centric today than ABC was in 1988, for example? I'm in no position to know.
Re effectiveness of Inman email:
Plushenko certainly fell into Inman's narrative by saying of course he had no transitions, though. Hard to argue with the horse's mouth himself.
.
But that was not reflective of what hapened at the Olympics. The fives came from the email- not what was done in the SP.
I just find Anissina kind of meaningless in the scheme of things; a great skater in the past, a worthy champion, but she has no real role in skating today. Why shouldn't she say whatever she wants? And she was not talking about conspiracies and such, just about what the scoring system is rewarding. I see it sort of like Elvis Stojko's comments over the years. Or Olivier Schoenfelder talking about how good the Canton teams are (which I believe he has), or the Janet Lynn piece currently being discussed in The Edge. They're done skating, let them speak their mind. Now if it were someone actively involved in skating, such a judge or an official... well, that would deserve condemnation.1. I have to admit, Buttercup, while I understand you wanting to balance the scales in terms politicking accusations and I know you've had some frustrations with the direction dance is headed, I'd argue that what Anissina does is exactly what you've opposed on the boards previously. I've always felt bad for Massimo Scali for how his comments were first mistranslated and then futher decontextualized.
Now that is an interesting point. Could it have been accomplished with a less controversial dance, or was that also calculated? Did Linichuk underestimate how badly it would be received in some contexts?As awful as that dance was, I think Linichuk knew what she was doing. She had to do something (A) different enough such that there wouldn't be any reasonable standard of comparison and (b) distract attention away from his injuries. That dance accomplished that perfectly.
Buttercup said:Now that is an interesting point. Could it have been accomplished with a less controversial dance, or was that also calculated? Did Linichuk underestimate how badly it would be received in some contexts?Imaginary Pogue said:As awful as that dance was, I think Linichuk knew what she was doing. She had to do something (A) different enough such that there wouldn't be any reasonable standard of comparison and (b) distract attention away from his injuries. That dance accomplished that perfectly.
IceWorks is one of the only public rinks in the United States or Canada that has a professional coaching staff. Jim Watson, former Philadelphia Flyer, leads the hockey staff along with the rink's General Manager Stephane Charbonneau. Uschi Keszler, coach of Olympic skater Elvis Stojko, leads a Figure Skating staff of 18 full-time coaches. Public skating is also offered for people of all ages.
I just find Anissina kind of meaningless in the scheme of things; a great skater in the past, a worthy champion, but she has no real role in skating today. Why shouldn't she say whatever she wants? And she was not talking about conspiracies and such, just about what the scoring system is rewarding. I see it sort of like Elvis Stojko's comments over the years. Or Olivier Schoenfelder talking about how good the Canton teams are (which I believe he has), or the Janet Lynn piece currently being discussed in The Edge. They're done skating, let them speak their mind. Now if it were someone actively involved in skating, such a judge or an official... well, that would deserve condemnation.
So in my mind, I'm very consistent. YMMV.
Now that is an interesting point. Could it have been accomplished with a less controversial dance, or was that also calculated? Did Linichuk underestimate how badly it would be received in some contexts?