- Joined
- Jan 3, 2007
To add my two cents, the thing that I find missing in skating competitions is SHOWMANSHIP. It is the reason that footwork sequences from Robin Cousins, Brian Orser, Phillippe Candeloro, Kurt Browning, Midori Ito, Michelle Kwan and many more are beloved and rewatched. They are full of passion, musical, fast and easily understood by skaters and non-skaters. The good intentions of requiring more and more difficult turns and steps in IJS have slowed down the step sequences and confused audiences who do not know one turn from another. The steps are often not matched to the music, executed with intense concentration and not directed towards the audience. Jumps do not suffer this musical dilemma as they can still be timed to the music whether single, double, triple or quads. Spins nowadays change edges and positions so fast, the general audience comes away thinking - well it was complicated so it must be worth more and the value of a beautifully executed spin done at speed for a sustained period is undervalued. Lets have more options in allowing skaters to choose different ways to gain points on these elements. Maybe the required complicated turns could be performed individually and replace some of the endless crossovers we see instead of creating such unmusical and corkscrewed footwork sequences. Maybe a spin done at speed with more rotations done in a single position that gives the appearance of a music box or gyroscope should be rewarded more.
As to less events on the Grand Prix - no way! We need to promote the human interest side of skating more - that is why so many people will tune into a previously unknown sport to suddenly become big fans. Take gymnastics Pommel Horse suddenly made popular by an unknown American- or a Brazilian lady performing floor exercise to the music of her culture. Bla bla bla on points gained here and there are boring to the general public who justs wants an enjoyable watch. Likewise jumps double, triple, axel vs Lutz, mean little to general audiences as they don't not know the difference and are not interested in a PhD of skating. Thrilling, fast creative entries and landings are what make audiences react. Also don't forget the value of what attracts everyone to ice skating - the value of a great, sustained glide. Watch some show and exhibitions to see what general audiences respond too and figure out a way to adjust the scoring to encourage and reward that when done with excellence.
As to less events on the Grand Prix - no way! We need to promote the human interest side of skating more - that is why so many people will tune into a previously unknown sport to suddenly become big fans. Take gymnastics Pommel Horse suddenly made popular by an unknown American- or a Brazilian lady performing floor exercise to the music of her culture. Bla bla bla on points gained here and there are boring to the general public who justs wants an enjoyable watch. Likewise jumps double, triple, axel vs Lutz, mean little to general audiences as they don't not know the difference and are not interested in a PhD of skating. Thrilling, fast creative entries and landings are what make audiences react. Also don't forget the value of what attracts everyone to ice skating - the value of a great, sustained glide. Watch some show and exhibitions to see what general audiences respond too and figure out a way to adjust the scoring to encourage and reward that when done with excellence.
Last edited: