Well, that's what the 240 posts on this thread are arguing about.
The consensus seems to be (but its not unanimous) that the USFSA will base the Olympic selection on the results of Nationals alone as they always have, and they are just kidding about those other four events, to fool the USOC.
Right, that is the feeling I got that from reading posts but I did not see anyone mention that docuemnt. (I did not read all 240 posts so maybe someone did.) Looking at those events would make sense. Not just placement, but the scores.
Does it really matter for the ladies when none of them have scored above 172 in any of those events? Most of the US ladies scores are in the 150s and low 160s.

BUT