Miki Ando pursues regaining her quad jump! | Page 2 | Golden Skate

Miki Ando pursues regaining her quad jump!

Miki's spins are pretty terrible.

She used to have a good layback (see 2006 Olympics SP), but in 2007 when she won her title, she had lost her ability to do a good layback, her sit position was absolutely atrocious, and she never had great speed or centering in any spin.

Hopefully she has improved this season.


I'm not talking about purely technical. I'm talking about overall artistic impact.
My vision is 20/20, and I assume yours is as well.

Miki's spins are beautiful.

Of course, everyone has different kinds of perception, and different things that they look for.

One of the main things I look for is artistic beauty.

And with Miki, I see it.

And it's fine that you don't see it. Different view.
I have no interest to change your view.

And I won't change my view.
 
I think a lot of the problems Miki was having with her spins and her spiral related to her dislocated shoulder. Spins are particularly hard on the shoulder joint because skaters have to pull their arms in and out to maintain the spin, and alternate centrifugal and centripetal forces stress the joint.

I was at Skate America last year, and noticed how below-par Miki's spins were. But she's finally had the surgery, so we should be seeing better spins from her.
 
I'm not talking about purely technical. I'm talking about overall artistic impact.
My vision is 20/20, and I assume yours is as well.

Miki's spins are beautiful.

That's a silly assertion. How are wobbly spins with poor positions "beautiful"? Most of Miki's spins detract from the program.

Let's look at a performance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ngijAUxLMU

Her sit position is flat-out terrible. Not sure how anyone could argue any differently. It would be liking saying an apple is blue. This is perfectly shown in ALL of the first three spins she does, you can view them at 1:41 , 3:21 , and 4:04. The first and third spins also display the wobbly quality I was talking about.

Her last spin of the program, a Layback (starts at 4:26), isn't any better. There's no great amount of speed (which the music calls for, if you're saying that her spins have a lot of "artistic impact"), the position is certainly not very good, and she again wobbles at the end of it.

:ohwell:
 
That's a silly assertion. How are wobbly spins with poor positions "beautiful"? Most of Miki's spins detract from the program.

Let's look at a performance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ngijAUxLMU

Her sit position is flat-out terrible. Not sure how anyone could argue any differently. It would be liking saying an apple is blue. This is perfectly shown in ALL of the first three spins she does, you can view them at 1:41 , 3:21 , and 4:04. The first and third spins also display the wobbly quality I was talking about.

Her last spin of the program, a Layback (starts at 4:26), isn't any better. There's no great amount of speed (which the music calls for, if you're saying that her spins have a lot of "artistic impact"), the position is certainly not very good, and she again wobbles at the end of it.

:ohwell:

Utter nonsense.

I don't need any lesson from you.

Anyone can easily look up and find weak points of certain performances by ANY skater.

And that is something I'm not in the habit of doing to fans of other skaters, pointing out whatever weak points I can find, as apparenty you are.

Besides the performance you are pulling up is not my favorite of hers. If you noticed, I never said it was. She won with it, but I much prefer her SP at that Worlds. And no need to pull up that link for me, either. I know it by heart.

I have already expressed my view. It's not changed, and it won't. I will leave it at that.
 
That's a silly assertion. How are wobbly spins with poor positions "beautiful"? Most of Miki's spins detract from the program.

Let's look at a performance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ngijAUxLMU

Her sit position is flat-out terrible. Not sure how anyone could argue any differently. It would be liking saying an apple is blue. This is perfectly shown in ALL of the first three spins she does, you can view them at 1:41 , 3:21 , and 4:04. The first and third spins also display the wobbly quality I was talking about.

Her last spin of the program, a Layback (starts at 4:26), isn't any better. There's no great amount of speed (which the music calls for, if you're saying that her spins have a lot of "artistic impact"), the position is certainly not very good, and she again wobbles at the end of it.

:ohwell:

Personally, I also think Miki’s spins are beautiful to watch, especially her SP at Skate America 2006, her arms, hands, the way how she uses her body and legs, even though her center position were often not totally centered.
I like her performance this one the most,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N2DJllq-qo&feature=related

So your point of your post is wanting to tell someone how terrible Miki’s spins are ?
Do you have any good reason to push your opinion to someone who has different view, calling “ silly “ , and trying to show your self-rightness to people ? It looks to me it’s no meaning to argue about artistry since it‘s very subjective , and everyone has different view.
 
What I like about Miki is that she's been to the top and to the very bottom and pulled herself back up to become a World Champion. She'd been written off by everyone, called names by the Japanese media and came back strong and taking names. That's a testament to never giving up and it made a fan out of me. :rock:
 
Anyone can easily look up and find weak points of certain performances by ANY skater.

And that is something I'm not in the habit of doing to fans of other skaters, pointing out whatever weak points I can find, as apparenty you are.

Miki's spins haven't been weak in that performance alone. What I showed is pretty much the norm.

So your point of your post is wanting to tell someone how terrible Miki’s spins are ?
Do you have any good reason to push your opinion to someone who has different view, calling “ silly “ , and trying to show your self-rightness to people ? It looks to me it’s no meaning to argue about artistry since it‘s very subjective , and everyone has different view.

No, the point of my post was discussion. Analyzing something in order to show an opinion.

You can certainly debate artistry. Sharing those "different views" is part of the purpose of a forum. And, sometimes, one view is more correct that another. The realm of opinions is often not so simple as "what's your favorite color", which would be an area where no opinion is incorrect because it truly is completely individual. Other times, that's not the case.

GL to Miki this season. I agree with the poster above me, her determination is admirable.
 
Miki's spins haven't been weak in that performance alone. What I showed is pretty much the norm.



No, the point of my post was discussion. Analyzing something in order to show an opinion.

You can certainly debate artistry. Sharing those "different views" is part of the purpose of a forum. And, sometimes, one view is more correct that another. The realm of opinions is often not so simple as "what's your favorite color", which would be an area where no opinion is incorrect because it truly is completely individual. Other times, that's not the case.

GL to Miki this season. I agree with the poster above me, her determination is admirable.

Do you honestly think I could care one iota what you think is beautiful or artistic or not ?

Or that next time I will consult with you, who apparently thinks that you have a direct line to the skating gods, before I make a decision as to what is beautiful, artistic or not ?

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::


Don't hold your breath, it won't happen :biggrin:


What's that ancient saying ? Oh yeah, " beauty is in the eye of the beholder "
 
A better saying would be "ignorance is bliss".

You clearly don't want to hear other opinions or be bothered to think about anything.
 
Miki's spins haven't been weak in that performance alone. What I showed is pretty much the norm.



No, the point of my post was discussion. Analyzing something in order to show an opinion.

You can certainly debate artistry. Sharing those "different views" is part of the purpose of a forum. And, sometimes, one view is more correct that another. The realm of opinions is often not so simple as "what's your favorite color", which would be an area where no opinion is incorrect because it truly is completely individual. Other times, that's not the case.

GL to Miki this season. I agree with the poster above me, her determination is admirable.

Yes, sharing our own view is what the discussion forum is for I think. And when we talk about artistry, It’s nothing about which is correct or not. IMO.

Are you feeling with your heart when you see art ? Or thinking ,calculating and analyzing ?

I was telling my impression from my heart of some of her spins look, as art. I don’t think someone can tell me how I feel or what my impression is when I look at something.

And I have no interest about who is correct when we talk about artistry. Because I know my own feelings, my own viewpoint. I won’t surprise there is math type of artists, and seeing art with calculation, but to me art is not calculation like you seem to be thinking. IMO.

I understand your point of view concerning her spins. when it comes to technique. But this does not affect my point of view whatsoever. when it comes to artistry.
But you are free to think whatever you want, same as me.

Sounds like our view is completely different. So, nothing to discuss about it with you anymore. No need to upset when someone disagree with you.
 
A better saying would be "ignorance is bliss".

Believe me, the feeling is mutual. :biggrin:

You clearly don't want to hear other opinions or be bothered to think about anything.

The better way to put it would be that I don't want to hear your opinion, because I don’t suffer ignorant opinions well, especially from “ know it alls “ who clearly don’t know it all.
 
Wow. Just wow.

You have done nothing to help your case and provided no support to your opinion at all. Someone can say "George W. Bush is one of the best American Presidents ever" until they are out of breath but, until they give some actual reasons, it's all just noise.

Pretty much every skating commentator has criticized Miki's spinning. A couple other posters in this thread have done the same. Her grade-of-execution scores in that area have certainly not been great either.

And you say I'm being ignorant.

If you wish to talk further, then you should point out some examples of your feelings rather than just repeating yourself ad nauseam.

Are you feeling with your heart when you see art ? Or thinking ,calculating and analyzing ?

I understand your point of view concerning her spins. when it comes to technique. But this does not affect my point of view whatsoever. when it comes to artistry.
But you are free to think whatever you want, same as me.

Technique helps artistry. A spin doesn't need to have difficult positions or a ton of speed to be effective, BUT, unattractive positions and a wobbly blade usually don't help.

You say that you see artistry when you look at her spins. In figure skating, for me, artistry is doing something that looks good and/or interprets the music and/or creates a feeling. Her spinning usually does not do any of those things. Some of the positions in her spins are simply atrocious and that's not just a detriment to her technical merit, it's also a detriment to her artistry since it looks bad and clearly does not help the music. And, believe me, that hurts my heart.

So, please, describe why you admire her spins. I've given specific examples as to why I don't think they are good artistically (such as that layback in her LP which doesn't go with the music, in addition to everything else). If any more discussion is to be had, you'll need to participate properly.
 
Discussions would only have meaning in talking about how improvements can be made. (...And maybe better watch out for the forum guidelines, you know...)

I'm happy enough to see that Miki is still improving her elements up till today. I see her spins really getting better.

Back to the topic. ...TV-Asahi just aired Miki landing several quads in the 2nd day practice. (Right in front of Yuna, coincidentally.)
They were so smooth that most of us might mistake them as triples.
It really made me think that there is much room for ladies doing quads without ruining the artistic character of their programs!!
 
You have done nothing to help your case and provided no support to your opinion at all. Someone can say "George W. Bush is one of the best American Presidents ever" until they are out of breath but, until they give some actual reasons, it's all just noise.

Pretty much every skating commentator has criticized Miki's spinning. A couple other posters in this thread have done the same. Her grade-of-execution scores in that area have certainly not been great either.

And you say I'm being ignorant.




Technique helps artistry. A spin doesn't need to have difficult positions or a ton of speed to be effective, BUT, unattractive positions and a wobbly blade usually don't help.

You say that you see artistry when you look at her spins. In figure skating, for me, artistry is doing something that looks good and/or interprets the music and/or creates a feeling. Her spinning usually does not do any of those things. Some of the positions in her spins are simply atrocious and that's not just a detriment to her technical merit, it's also a detriment to her artistry since it looks bad and clearly does not help the music. And, believe me, that hurts my heart.

So, please, describe why you admire her spins. I've given specific examples as to why I don't think they are good artistically (such as that layback in her LP which doesn't go with the music, in addition to everything else). If any more discussion is to be had, you'll need to participate properly.

Great points, you've supported your stance beautifully, w/o being disrespectful to anyone. Now I've got some things I can watch for in Miki's spins.
 
Wow. Just wow.

You have done nothing to help your case and provided no support to your opinion at all. Someone can say "George W. Bush is one of the best American Presidents ever" until they are out of breath but, until they give some actual reasons, it's all just noise.

And you say I'm being ignorant.

If you wish to talk further, then you should point out some examples of your feelings rather than just repeating yourself ad nauseam.

Technique helps artistry. A spin doesn't need to have difficult positions or a ton of speed to be effective, BUT, unattractive positions and a wobbly blade usually don't help.

You say that you see artistry when you look at her spins. In figure skating, for me, artistry is doing something that looks good and/or interprets the music and/or creates a feeling. Her spinning usually does not do any of those things. Some of the positions in her spins are simply atrocious and that's not just a detriment to her technical merit, it's also a detriment to her artistry since it looks bad and clearly does not help the music. And, believe me, that hurts my heart.

So, please, describe why you admire her spins. I've given specific examples as to why I don't think they are good artistically (such as that layback in her LP which doesn't go with the music, in addition to everything else). If any more discussion is to be had, you'll need to participate properly.

Because it’s not about right or wrong when we talk about artistry as I already told you.
I understand your view of artistry, technical part influence artistry. And you think if technical part is not right it can not possibly be beautiful. But I didn’t think Miki’s spins are completely unbalanced, and terrible technically either, which you are saying. And the whole impression of some of her spins look beautiful.

Again, it’s just an one’s view. Seems like you want to know which is right or wrong, answer is always only one way, according to you , black or white. Grey may not exist in your world. And you think you are correct and different views are wrong. Want to convince your opinion to others.

There are people who don’t have same view as you. I understand you don’t like mystery. But I love it. Art and artistry is mystery, that’s why it’s interesting to me.

The discussion started from “ Miki’s spins are beautiful “ and seems like this comment bothered you, and you started talking “ her spins are pretty terrible !” as if it’s the fact. Then you are calling “ silly “, “ ignorance is bliss “ to those who have different opinion. This is not respectful , Your post sounds completely self centered thinking. IMO.

You think her spins are terrible and explain why, because technically it’s bad so it can not be beautiful, from your view. And her spins ruin her other parts.

Which I don’t agree. Because in my eyes, when she is on, her good points of artistry delete her bad points of technique.

Just like when Lambiel is on, if his artistry is on, his falling on jumps don’t detract from the programs for me. Same as for Sandhu.


Pretty much every skating commentator has criticized Miki's spinning. A couple other posters in this thread have done the same. Her grade-of-execution scores in that area have certainly not been great either.

Sounds like you need the support of commentators, or the support of a majority of people, to form your own opinions of artistic impression , you apparently don’t form your own view by your self. I see. I often disagree with commentators, because their comments, especially comments on skaters artistry, are also their own view. Sometimes even their own biased view.

And my favorite part of Miki’s skating is not only spins. Total impression of her program, the one I posted the link to, in my last post, is beautiful to watch, for me. She cares about small detailed parts of movements. And I love it.

I already explained why I think some of her spins are beautiful, the way how she uses her body, arms , hands, and leg, it’s complete package artistically .

Even though some skaters may have technically perfect spins , level 4 or whatever, and praised by the commentators, I don’t feel anything from them artistically.
 
Last edited:
Has Kim ever cried or showed much emotions after a performance? I actually don't remember.

I can't remember where but I read that YuNa cried soon after her 2008 Worlds SP in private. She was considering withdrawing after the SP because of the pain in her injured hip. I don't think people other than those closest to her knew it. YuNa just doesn't seem like the crying type.

Poor Mao & Ando are under such media scrutiny that I don't blame them for crying.
 
Last edited:
Does Miki ever practice running through her FS with the quad, or does she just practice the quad separately? So far the videos just show her landing individual jumps, not running through programs.

I'll believe she can land a quad in context (i.e., within a program) when I see her actually do it. That's what she hasn't been able to do since she was 14 going on 15.

All the other skaters (except Mira) have been doing runthroughs. Why not Miki? It makes me wonder if she's going to have stamina problems in competition.
 
Last edited:
Poor Mao & Ando are under such media scrutiny that I don't blame them for crying.

I felt sorry for Mao when they filmed her crying after learning the final result at the backstage of the 2007 Worlds. You know, it was the backstage and the American TV showed only her initial cute, adorable gesture of dissapointment, but Japanese TVs focused on her tears after that initial response and made a lot of dramas out of it. I also felt sorry when she needed to have interviews while she was still upset at a couple of occasions.
 
Back
Top