I like Elena, but she still looks like a little girl. Is this really what skating has come to? The PCS elements are either nebulous or have nothing to do with artistry (e.g., skating skills, transitions) or even the skater (choreography), allowing child-like skaters who can jump to get extremely high overall scores while a more artistic skater who makes technical errors that are not visible to the naked eye in many cases is penalized on both scores. I think Mirai is a case in point. She fell on a jump which cost her 5-6 points, maybe. The rest of her program looked clean to the viewer without instant replay. She had excellent spins and footwork and difficult elements. Even with the mistakes that showed up in slo-mo, was it really 30 points worse than Elena's skate?
I agree that Elena still looks very young but the fact is she's only 15 years old. She
is young, but that shouldn't be held against her.
I actually agree with Elena's PCS. She maintains good speed and covers the ice well (SS). Her program appears to be a little busy at times but it's b/c it is packed full of transitions throughout; whether she's going into a jump/spin or coming out of one, there's some kind of transition (TR). You don't see Elena just doing crossovers to set up her elements. She is completely engaged in the performance from start to finish. She never looks like she's just going through the motions. She connects, projects and sells her program very well (PE). For a 15 year old, she interprets the music wonderfully. I never get the sense Elena is skating through her music; she moves with it and that's something that many skaters older than her aren't capable of doing (IN). Her choreography (CH) isn't the absolute best but it is good enough. There are musical moments in the program and the movements are phrased well. Additionally, IMO anyway, her natural ability to perform elevates whatever choreography she's doing.
Though people like to point to the fact that Elena looks like a little girl, the reality is she's meeting all of the criteria in the PCS category. With all of these younger skaters coming into the mix, I'm beginning to realize that
maturity isn't part of PCS. I definitely think maturity should factor into the scores but when a person's only major fault is that they
look like a little girl, I don't think that argument has much merit...especially when the mature skaters in the field aren't bringing anything to the table. Just because someone is younger/smaller/doesn't have a mature appearance doesn't mean they deserve less credit for what they do on the ice.
IMO, Elena
was close to 30 point better than Ashley and Mirai. She out-jumped and out-performed both of them. Ashley's program isn't soup yet and with her jumps MIA and her spins sub par, I don't think she deserved a great score. I do think she received a few bogus < calls but even without them, she did not skate well at all. Mirai put forth a great effort in terms of attacking her program BUT she still isn't getting all of her jumps around. In addition to that, she's not selling the program from start to finish. That energy and sparkle she brought to the last 30 seconds of her program should have been there from the beginning. Mirai's footwork was a only a level 2; her layback spin was great but the other two spins, though they had nice positions, were a bit slow.
I do think both Ashley and Mirai deserved higher PCS in certain areas but the fact of the matter remains neither of them deserves scores that would put them anywhere near what Elena or Satoko did based on their performances at JO. Until they can rotate and land their jumps, max their elements and perform their programs, they don't deserve to score as well as the stronger, albeit younger, skaters in the field.
This is a new quad and I'm glad the judges aren't holding seniority against these younger skaters. I am fully supportive of judges awarding skaters for what they do on the ice rather than who they are or how old they are...