But in all seriousness - i've never been to a COP competition - do fans in the arena get to see the protocols when the skaters marks come up? I didn't think that the information regarding the levels the elements received and what the jumps were called and theh GOEs were only available to people with press credentials. If the fans in the arena do not know that the judge downgraded Lambiel's 3A to a double, how do they know to pile onto the ice and start a fight?!
Sometime, they post the results. Otherwise we in the audience are free of commentators and, of course, argue among our selves. There is always someone near to say, 'it's been downgraded. In the case of Lambiel, where I was sitting, it was a clean landing. When I heard about the downgrade, I was livid but he won anyway.
I can't say that I liked seeing what happened in SLC - i thought it was a very bad situation that was hadnled badly by everyone, especially the media. Demonizing Elena&Anton for something that was the judges fault not their's was disgusting and the amount of people that jumped on that badnwagon made it worse. I was extremely pleased that the cheating was made known and agree that the double award of the gold medals was the only real way out of that particular situation but i did not like what it did to the sport namely: made everyone think that the sport is crooked all the way through and that it allowed $peedy to push through this new judging system with added annonimity to prevent him ever being caught on the back foot again.
No one was happy about that story of events. The resulting enquiry led by Speedy brought about the 2 medals to placate the OIC and Stop the Investigation. We only know that the collusion was in part by France and no one else except by speculation, BTW, I think what happened in SLC was more than a bad situation. It has, for me, turned people off figure skating.
I'm not sure its quite that black and white and all fans fall into one or the other. In any event i think Mathman just likes to see what the numerous pages of rules say about the sport since that is exactly what judges, coaches, skaters and choregorahpers have to do. Whether you agree with and support the rules is a whole different angle than figuring out what the rules actually are. I would say that it is very difficult to critique the rules with anything other than emotional reaction, if you don't have a handle on what the rules actually say in the first place.
There's no intent on putting down MM, He knows that. I appreciate his statistical collection of the results of these competitions. They always make me pause on what I originally thought. It's very true that I critique the rules and there are some changes that come, not from me alone, but many others. We are just not brought up to agree with the hierarchy. Case in point is the all-the-way-down sitspin. Going partially down and twisting your body, to me, is much easier than going all the way down and moreso all the way up. However, MM is correct in that the GoEs give the contorted body more points, but that just doesn't change my way of thinking. Sorry about that as per your next paragraph.
I think its good to hear what the COP according to fan X and fan Y is - people always have opinions on how it should be. I think Mathman is one of the best people for ferreting out what the rules actually are. Ant
Not just the opinions but the facts which are the real thing. You know as I do that certain posters hold fast to their opinions and you are not surprised at their posts.
Joe