Joe, I don't see how you can say that. According to the article, the Canadian Association refused to come to come to the U.S. (in part) because of crooked judging. This is not just unfounded rumor and speculation, it is the decision that the Canadian Federation actually announced publicly.
That is (provided that the article is accurate), the Canadian Federation came right out and "cited" biased judging as a reason for "abruptly cancelling" a 50-year tradition..
The competition was discontinued when the Canadian federation abruptly cancelled its participation in the 1973 event, which was to have been held in Rochester, New York. The CFSA cited problems with the judging (which tended to favor the skaters of whichever country had a majority of judges on the panel)...
It's like in the early part of the century when the German, Russian, and Swedish champions refused to skate in each others' countries because judging bias was so rampant.
In contrast, the Salt Lake City thing was not as bad, for the simple reason that the malefactors got caught. This is a good thing. It is far worse for the problems just to continue to fester, with everyone turning a deliberate blind eye to what is going on.
In Sonia Bianchetti's book she calls the Salt Lake City scandal just the "tip of the iceberg." She cites crooked judging (and her fight against it, which ultimately failed when the ISU kicked her out) throughout her 40 years of service to the sport. She describes how, in her very first judging assignment, she was approached by representatives of her National Federation to throw the contest.
In 1978 the whole Russian Federation was forbdden to participate in the judging of any figure skating contest for a year because it had become so blatant that even the ISU was embarrassed.
Are you saying that this was OK -- or worse, that it didn't happen -- just because it wasn't on the front pages of newspapers?