Pairs Free Skate | Page 2 | Golden Skate

Pairs Free Skate

PAng and tong doubled the loop, Zhangs now... ohhhh mistakes on opening jumps and fell out of the final lift, If S&S skate somewhat well they should take this
 
Last edited:
nope. nothing on the isu website, but so far

1Pang/Tong (she doubled a throw, so uncaracteristic)
2Dube/Davidson (she fell on a throw)
 
pang/Tong - had 185 (and something) overall

zhangs weren't clean...and no emotions for me!!! I don't like this pair... - 191.20 - first overall
 
savchenko/szolkowy - amazing free skate.. only robin hands down on the solo jump...I hope they willl wiin this!
 
tarasova sounds really happy....

I liked this performance. they had some problems on sbs spins and, for a change, on the sbs salchows
 
Savchenko Szolkowy 127.09 199.23
Zhang/Zhang 191.20 (TES:59.32 - he singled an axel then put his hands down on the triple toe)
Pang/Tong 185.13
Dube/Davison (SB for them i think) 172.43
Kawaguchi/Smirnov 167.65
 
YEEEEAAAAHHH!!!! :rock: The Germans get the win they deserve, even the usual proposterous overscoring of the hideous Zhangs cant save them.
 
Savchenko/Szolkowy won...thanks god!!!

can anyone explain me why are zhangs on 2nd place? I think, that pang tong were better, don't they?
 
It came down to this

1 Savchenko/Szolkowy 199
2 Zhang/Zhang 191
3 Pang/Tong 185
4 Dube/Davison 172
5 Kawaguchi/Smirnov 161
 
Scores from TV (since WIGE data is stuck):
Savchenko/Szolkowy 62.17 (TES) 65.92 (PCS) (-1 ded.) 127.09 (FS) 199.23 (1st overall)
Zhang/Zhang 59.32 (TES) 60.48 (PCS) 119.80 (FS) 191.20 (2nd overall)
Pang/Tong 58.85 (TES) 59.60 (PCS) 118.45 (FS) 185.13 (3rd overall)
Dube/Davison 172.43 (4th overall)
Kawaguchi/Smirnov 161.75 (5th overall)
WD McLaughlin/Brubaker
 
Savchenko/Szolkowy won...thanks god!!!

can anyone explain me why are zhangs on 2nd place? I think, that pang tong were better, don't they?

Because the Zhangs are one of the most overscored teams in history, that is why they finish 2nd when they deserve to be 3rd here. Dont look to their skating and its merit for answers, you will find none.
 
Back
Top