I have to say good job by Inoue and Baldwin. I think they have improved this year over last year...they had pretty good speed in the SP and showed more connection to the music. Also happy to see that they did the throw loop vs. the axel. If she can land the loop like that all the time, why risk the axel?
The issue is whether missing the axel is worth the points vs. making the loop. They use the triple loop throw in all their exhibition programs, and it is very consistent for them. A curious thing happened in COP this year. For side by side (or for that matter, jumps in singles), the base value for quads and for triple axels went up and the size of GOE deductions also went up. However in pairs, the base value for quad and triple axel throws did not go up, but they upped the size of the GOE deductions anyway. Consequently, it isn't as good a risk to do a full rotated quad or 3A throw with a fall/bad GOE as it used to be. So this year, they should stick with the loop in SP, I think.
In the LP, the question then becomes what to do with the second throw in the LP. Inoue has never had all that reliable a salchow, either as a singles skater, or as a throw, compared to the loop. With her previous partner, they did the double axel for a second throw, which is probably what got I&B working on the triple.
What's puzzling is why they never worked on a throw triple lutz. Inoue has a fine triple lutz as a single skater (and was successfully doing it as a pair skater two or three seasons back, but John wasn't landing them in competition). To begin with, the loop and the flip/lutz throws in COP got the same points. However a while ago (2 years I think? but am not sure), the flip and lutz got an extra 0.5 base points. Why John and Rena didn't start working on it, I don't know.
Perhaps they didn't want to mess with her timing on the lutz as a non throw element. People always claim that doing throw salchows was why Kristi Yamaguchi always had trouble with the triple salchow, so maybe that has something to do with it.