- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
Yeah but can we actually be sure they will judge things fairly? Because I'm not.
We are always at the mercy of the judges. But I do not put much stock in all the sininster theories about factions in the USFS inner sanctum that are pro or anti a particular skater.
When it comes to selection to the Olympic team, I do not see any other possible motivation for the Association than to put the strongest possible team on the ice and hope for the best.
Yes, they gave Michelle the benefit of the doubt in 2006. But Michelle was the U.S. chanpion the year before, a five time world champion, etc., etc., etc. Neither Michelle now, nor Sasha, nor anyone else will be seeking any special deals this time around.
Here are the guidelines for selecting the Olympic team (in the official language, for nominating the team to the USOC.) In order of importance, they will take into account.
1. Placement at 2010 Nationals (January 1-14).
2. 2009 Grand Prix finals (Dec.3, 2009).
3. 2009 Worlds (Rachael was 5th, Alissa 11th).
4. "The most recent Four Continents." (Caroline was 4th at 2009 Four C's, Racahel 7th, Alissa 9th. In 2010, Four C's is squeezed in between U.S. Nationals and the Olympics. Conceivably, if USFS were in doubt, they could wait until after 4C's to make their final decision. I think it is more likely that they will name the Olympic team right after Nationals and not even send those skaters to 4C's.)
5. 2009 Junior Worlds. (Caroline was second, Ashley third.)
6. 2009 Junior Grand Prix final. (Will not play a role this year.)
Caroline and Rachael are the only skaters that carry any brownie points forward. I absolutely agree with Particle Man that Sasha will have to get first or second at U.S. Nationals to make the team -- and the same goes for everyone.
(On the men's side, I think Lysacek would go even if he finishes 4th at Nationals.)
Last edited:
