Red Dog said:
Well, some people are made for it, others aren't. At this point I think I know where SC stands.
At this point (and I stress AT THIS POINT), competition is not for her. It's not a bash, not a put-down, just an observation of mine. Could be way off base, or I could be right on. But it's JMO.
Somehow I think I'll be very surprised if she chooses to come back next year.
Katerina Witt has been saying basically the same thing, that you're either born to be consistent or your not. Although I don't think it's quite that black and white, I think Witt also knows she's got to get it into a soundbite.
I think that, like almost everything involving people, the ability to be consistent with your jumps in figure skating runs on a standard bell curve. Some people, such as Michelle, are at least three standard deviations on the positive side of innate consistency. Good training only made her better.
Others hover around the mean, ie, average. They have a certain amount of innate ability to be consistent, but they need the right training and great determination to make the most of it. I'd put Nancy Kerrigan in that category.
I'd put Sasha about one or two standard deviations toward the negative tail of the bell curve. She wasn't born with much innate ability to be consistent with her jumps in competition; she started relatively late in skating, about nine years old, which didn't help; and it seems she didn't get the best technical training on her jumps for her in order to make the most out of what little innate talent she had to be consistent on her jumps. Also, I get the feeling that until the '03/04 season, Cohen felt the consistency would come if she just kept working at it and found the right coach. I think her motivation was more external than internal until '03/04. Therefore, to finally realize sometime in '03/04 that her jump consistency wasn't going to just come with time and practice, and that the determination to do so needed to come from inside her and not from finding "the right coach" (I'm paraphrasing what she said in the fluffer on her before '06 Nats), well, let's just say it was too little too late. I find it sad and feel badly for her. She had a tough problem to solve, realized how tough it was too late, and made some critical poor decisions about how to try to solve it. How many of us can say we made great decisions about problems as critical to our success between the ages of 18 and 21?
Still, that's the nature of the sport. I hope her decisions on what to do now result in a better skating situation for her and a happier situation for her personally. Sasha has never seemed to be a happy camper in the eligible ranks. IMO, she is a gorgeous skater with talents that many, many skating fans adore. However, she's missing one key element in order to be truly successful in eligible competition. I, for one, would be sad to see her crumble away with COI the way Nicole Bobek has. OTOH, it took Paul Wylie until he was 27 to win his one significant international meda, the '92 Olympic silver medal, which he was able to use to initiate a phenomenal professional career. However, that was a different era for pro skaters then.
So Sasha is faced with another very difficult and complex decision. Finally, and I hate to even say this, John Nicks is 76 years old. I'm sorry, but I can't help but remember Carlo Fassi dying at Worlds (can't recall the year) when Nicole Bobek was his primary student. Bobek finally seemed to have her act together and a coach with whom she had
sympatico. Then, tragically, he died the day before her LP. Angela Nikodinov had a similar situation with her coach Elena Tcherkyskaya (sp?), not to mention many more hardships and tragedies.
I wish Sasha the best.
Rgirl