In all honesty - I am simply glad that they not skipped GPF, skated the way they skated, received scores and placement they received, it all became more clear and obvious, for them foremost. I hope those realizations taken from Nagoya competition will allow them for even more freedom, abandon in creative process, in pushing boudaries broader. If you cannot break the celling, take your work on another level.
For me personally, I feel blessed to have an opportunity to see such challenging performances from them like today's. They kept to convince me to this FD idea and succeeded at SC - I saw equally vividly and soundly both perspective from where they came with the dance and the direction they want to take it . I understood the boldness of concept, boldness of movement, connection and expression, why the design of movement/choreography makes so much sense and cohesion with music and their characters. Today's performance helped me to realize that what draws me inside this FD and what wins me in it over all other programs is the evolution of it, how it morphes, looking different each tme performed, but having same strong impact on me. This methamorphosis ability was showed today in full display in my oinion: Tango section got much more flavour, flare, sharpness, 'rawness' between them in connection, while lyrical part got much more deeper and sound in reception, it got much closer to the people watching I feel, not only closer between them - and to emote this 'closure', intimacy out through movement and gesture is really not an easy task with that sort of program. I respect their conviction, confidence and engagement expressed towards the music and whole program concept - one can see that they truly believe in that program and mean every single step, kick, head turn and hands held moment.
Another thing I love that I realized watching their FD today is its 'decisive', 'polarizing' impact created - this is kind of program which performance leaves almost no one indifferent, this 'love or hate' quality is so real about their FD - and yet so weirdly fantastic in my opinion. I love programs that provoke me - programs daring me to challenge my way of perception, way of thinking about certain terms, aesthetics, conventions, borders, tastes, matters of expressing yourself; programs that simply make me think outside of the box and go outside of my perceptional 'comfort zone'. This whole 'Moulin Rouge' choice, boldness/risk of it, using two totally different pieces from it, with that much contrast, level of 'flashiness' and dare in choreography design, expressiveness of their faces and gestures, making performance very 'out-there', yet controlled... - all those things (and even more) makes me questioning the whole concept, how to understand it, ho to take it/interpret it and feel it out: why they used that way of expression/that element, what they've intended to say with it, why to use polarizing music and parts of it so different from each other, why so much contrast? Todays' performance of that FD was for me the most clear and unified manifesto so far of what they've came with deciding on that program. At this point, I don't even care about non-univeral factor of that FD, not receiving 'grade of effortlessness' for it, not suiting to a lot of people - what matters (and makes me happy), are those few more people who admitted to 'get' Tessa and Scott's perspective and direction of that program after today's performance; it shows that it is worthy to push themselves - and challenge the others.
From purely 'technically-related' standpoint, I have an impression that while work done in circular step sequence totally re-shaped first part of the program in big plus, midline one got much more room to make a mistake/misstep. I do not really see this softness and relaxed feel in midline step sequence as a favour nor needed thing - in my opinion, they should revisit with their team second step sequence from their previous FD last season: it had abandon an a sense of freedom it it, yet it was very controlled, structured and sharp one, it was more open than the first one, but sill with 'close-to-themselves' factor achieved. I think that's the thing to work on and incorporate going forward - along with of course morphing/evolving the program altogether.
While I was bit 'at loss' after SD, I am way more 'built' and feeling solid after today's FD - Tessa and Scott should never be ashamed of what they've put today, now it's more about switching perspective/mode to 'reaching' than 'grabbing'.