You don't think that saying that it doesn't matter if we have three spots is in itself nasty? There's subtext there: what you're really saying is that no one matters except for Nathan.
Also: somewhere you wrote essentially that you're fickle about what you like in figure skating; to paraphrase, that these days you're in the mood for muscular wow programs and not laybacks; that you used to like Jason but now he bores you.
It's not that you've said anything so nasty about a particular skater, but rather that you seemingly don't value anything about any skater beyond what they do for you - kind of like a steak versus chicken dinner.
And you didn't really answer my question. If sport is worth pursuing, then how can being number 8 in the world be bad, especially a year after a major injury? Especially when everyone ahead of you on that list is landing quads?
And speaking of quads and medals, how can you possibly know what Jason or anyone else will achieve in the future? You can't. Would you have predicted his skate at Nats in 2014?
You seem to put skaters into little boxes: worth investing in, not worth investing in. And forgive me, but I don't see how you can possibly be equipped to make that judgement.
As to the US legacy of champions and their responsibility to groom the ones most likely to achieve if, sorry, but a responsibility to whom? Figure skating fans? The nation? It's not like figure skating is state supported here. Parents pay. The only reason I can think of why USFS would want to groom champions is because more interest in the sport puts more money in their pockets.
First of all you don't think USFSA invests in skaters. This is a political sport, and so federation support does matter, and skaters at the sport, do get at least some funding if they medal at Nationals etc. Jason was not top two at nationals-so he was placed on the team.
I agree with looking at other results but I don't think top 8 season best is a huge thing to write home about. I don't think they were necessarily wrong, but its not a huge accomplishment as to bypass nationals. Especially over a younger skater who frankly has not had the same opportunities. And that's why I keep on mentioning it. Because we are talking about bypassing nationals. And I agree with bypassing in the case of a Wagner for Sochi because Wagner medaled at the GPF that year did really well at Worlds. But Jason had one good event this season, one not so good event and doesn't have content.
So in that circumstance I am not a fan of bypassing Nationals.
As for what Jason will accomplish in the future. I would love to be proven wrong. But Jason is 22 and he has yet to master a quad not one. He's not young in the sport. Most of the men who master the quad, they have mastered at least one or two well before his age. I suspect its one thing to be able to do one and then add in others. But to not be able to do one? When you others doing multiple types of ones.
Not everyone is able to do a quad. By all accounts Jason is a hard worker, so I don't think its a matter of not trying.
I would love to be proven wrong about him, but I think when it comes to political support etc. The USFSA would be foolish to not wonder if Jason will ever be able to compete with the top men.
And once again seasonal best does not make you top 8 in the world. They are all not competiting at same competition. And as I said earlier especially with the injuries there is a LOT of men who can finish ahead of him.
IF the best USA could was 8th that's one thing but they have men coming up who are better technically and its foolish for them not to promote them.
So what I am saying is USFSA bypassed Nationals. For a guy who is technically well below the other top men. That its very much a gamble because with Brown your relying on other mistakes. Jason is not in full control of his fate at Worlds.
And then you also by doing this lose the opportunity of given a young skater an opportunity to compete under pressure and grow in that way.