I still don't get it .Is this thread about the question, is Malinin the quadgod or not? Is it about the question of whether he deliberately performed poorly in this event because his eyes are on making money in shows instead of on improving his skating? Is it about his maternal legacy (his mom Tatiana Malinina, representing Uzbekistan in the 1990s, was known for having secure jumps but not so strong on the second mark)?
Is it yet another thread about how bad the ISU judges are?
None of these, in my humble opinion, bear on the question of the thread, which is, did anything happen at the 2024 GP Final that makes us think that there is some kind of "new era" dawning in figure skating.
My opinion is, quite the contrary. grumble grumble grumble big jumpers have a point advantage in the IJS scoring system. Yes they do. Same old same old.
In this particular performance (LP) Malinin prepared an astounding flurry of jumps, worth about 93.5 base value points, The quality was not what we hoped for, as was reflected in the judging to the tune of minus 11.13 GOE points, for qs , etc. He lost 6.7 points off base value for three under rotations (plus an extra point for a fall). His PCSs were somewhat lower than he got at 2024 worlds for. clean program (third to Kagiyama and Adam SHF at worlds, second to Kagiyama here).
All of this reduced his score in the LP by 20 points, and he finished second in the segment. Well, that's figure skating, That's sports. Sometimes you're on fire, sometimes you struggle to perform up to expectations and hopes.