Agreed. McGill would be great. D&L are on the rise. KRylova and cam are swamped and seem to be stagnating.
McGill is not only excellent, but is English rather than French. Probably a major consideration for the Shibs.
Agreed. McGill would be great. D&L are on the rise. KRylova and cam are swamped and seem to be stagnating.
So, it's not just me then...? :no: I thought their SD was wonderful. FD wasn't the most exciting, but it didn't look sloppy or something."We're really pleased with our performance, but sometimes in ice dance you just don't understand the scores, but we struggle and we fight through," Maia Shibutani said while resisting tears.
Shibutanis comments after GPF. This time they openly talk about their scores and not being happy. (resisting tears might be overdramatic from icenetwork)
http://web.icenetwork.com/news/2014/12/13/104027246?tcid=tw_share
"We're really pleased with our performance, but sometimes in ice dance you just don't understand the scores, but we struggle and we fight through," Maia Shibutani said while resisting tears.
"We put together two good performances here and we connected with the audience," Alex Shibutani said. "That meant a lot to us, especially when you can't control your scores.
Shibutanis comments after GPF. This time they openly talk about their scores and not being happy. (resisting tears might be overdramatic from icenetwork)
http://web.icenetwork.com/news/2014/12/13/104027246?tcid=tw_share
"We're really pleased with our performance, but sometimes in ice dance you just don't understand the scores, but we struggle and we fight through," Maia Shibutani said while resisting tears.
"We put together two good performances here and we connected with the audience," Alex Shibutani said. "That meant a lot to us, especially when you can't control your scores.
Ice dance has a long history of questionable judging. They shouldn't feel bad if the technical panel was unusually harsh on them or if their judges marks weren't what they expected. It is what it is unfortunately.
Shibutanis comments after GPF. This time they openly talk about their scores and not being happy. (resisting tears might be overdramatic from icenetwork)
http://web.icenetwork.com/news/2014/12/13/104027246?tcid=tw_share
"We're really pleased with our performance, but sometimes in ice dance you just don't understand the scores, but we struggle and we fight through," Maia Shibutani said while resisting tears.
"We put together two good performances here and we connected with the audience," Alex Shibutani said. "That meant a lot to us, especially when you can't control your scores.
Of course but it's very hard when step sequence is given a level 2 and it hard to know why if everyone believes they did everything right. Like there is no level of detail that says "female Skater put blade wrong here and here and here" or whatever. Then they have to watch the videos and see for themselves where they went wrong in he step sequence.
No? I thought it was exactly like that. Sisinka does this kind of analysis little time after each competition
The Shibs are not terrible but I hope that they grow ever more resilient and take no crap from the judges anymore.
A bit of aggression is necessary to try and push through in the ice dance world.
I am confident that they will move up again this year at worlds.
They do it but the tech panel doesn't! And then lots take it as opinion and not fact. Like kustarova famously said b/s only do level 4 elements but d/w and v/m have to win so their level 4s are not called.
I don't want to be mean, but have they ever actually watched themselves? They are so blah... their skating doesn't have the wow factor.
I don't find them blah at all--in fact, I enjoyed them the most of all the ice dancers at the GPF.
I don't find them blah at all--in fact, I enjoyed them the most of all the ice dancers at the GPF.
I'm not sure about it.
Officially Marina is their coach too, but de facto she is like a consultant . So I'm not sure she is spendind more time with them than Igor did.
More important, C&L need to work on their tech.elements mostly, not creativity.
For me there is no passion, no aggression, no expression as such in their dances. I am not suggesting passion towards each other, but some passion towards whatever they are interpreting. More commitment into interpreting how they are feeling. Music is dramatic - let's show drama. Music calmed down - let's calm it for now. Then again change in the music, and let's express it - with movements, whole body/face... To me they feel like two people who are skating and their face/body/movement is not telling me anything. They plaster a smile on and that's it. They interpret the waltz with the same expression as they did the Jackson program. And the waltz is throughout the program constantly the same. If I was packaging them, I would choose something that would make them try to be a bit over the top. Because I don't think they are used to showing they feelings and if they think something will be over the top, in reality it will be 'just right'.
The partnership between siblings can work. We saw it with Kerrs. But I don't think their weakness is that they are siblings. I think their weakness is that they are not expressive enough. Maybe some acting classes, where they have to constantly interpret various feelings according to the music that is played. And better/more interesting programs wouldn't hurt either.