- Joined
- Dec 18, 2003
attyfan said:I don't agree, at least not at this stage. One issue is whether Michelle should be punished for being nice by being criticized for seeking the same right granted to Todd Eldredge, Meno & Sand and other athletes who weren't whacked -- the right to seek a medical bye -- and get sent to the Olys, over young skaters who competed at Nats. It was OK for Todd, or for Meno & Sand, why isn't it OK for Michelle? Certainly, this kind of criticism for Michelle will not encourage other skaters to be nice.
The second is when the Olympics should be the time for giving experience to young skaters, as opposed to sending the best, even when the best couldn't compete at Nats. In all the discussion over who should and shouldn't go, I have not found a lot of people who think that Emily is actually better than Kan.
I don't think whether Michelle is nice or not (and that's certainly opinion based) has anything to do with her conditional placement on the Oly team. IMO it's about picking the best Ladies team to represent the US at the 2006 Oly's, which has nothing to do with Todd, Meno/Sand, or any other past skaters/teams.
While Emily is a promising young skater, I don't think you WILL find anyone suggesting that Emily has better Oly performance prospects than a healthy Kwan.
Competition is tough sometimes, but this one is also fair IMO.
DG