Re: Nancy
I watched Nancy live on an exhibition sometime in 1993 and I enjoyed her performance... she had the speed, the jumps.. it was exciting... In all fairness, Nancy retained her skating ability far more than Oksana has in their post Olympic years. While Oksana gave up her triples and even had trouble with doubles, Nancy did some interesting exhibition programs and kept her triples.
I watched Nancy live on an exhibition sometime in 1993 and I enjoyed her performance... she had the speed, the jumps.. it was exciting... In all fairness, Nancy retained her skating ability far more than Oksana has in their post Olympic years. While Oksana gave up her triples and even had trouble with doubles, Nancy did some interesting exhibition programs and kept her triples.
soogar said:I just want to say that I meet lots of casual fans at the rink who only skate around in a circle and the only thing they say about Sasha is that she is beautiful and rave about her spirals. I see hockey dads on the ice with their daughters who are taking figure skating lessons and when the girl did a spiral, dad told her to get her leg higher like that girl on TV. I see a lot of little girls who have been skating for a few years emulating Sasha's legless spin (ie the one where she lifted her leg), the I spin and Sasha's spiral (in addition to the horrible Butt spin).
In the end, Sasha will be remembered for her stretch and elegance. There are girls (and adults like myself) who are striving to achieve that look on the ice. There are skaters like Nancy Kerrigan who had that one good LP in the Olympics in 1994 and in spite of that, other than her costumes, no one was striving to skate like Nancy. In fact, the only thing that Nancy is remembered for is the whack, and not for anything that she has done on the ice.
While having a title is a memorable thing, I think a skater is even more memorable if they can influence the next generation.