- Joined
- Mar 7, 2015
i agree with CSG here that the mistakes are not just influencing PE but other components as well... hence why i am quoting your answer to him and your answer to my post....
for me there is no point comparing Yuzu's score with the others at this competition... do i believe he should have been scored less high? YES... do i believe he was not deserving to win.... NO WAY....
it's just sending the wrong message to give scores that are near perfect to someone's pretty much worst skate of the season in LP.
that's the point we are making.... where is the sport going if the PSC are handed so generously.... almost without a difference on whether or not a skater was flawless or not....
for me, 3% less than GPF would mean, a flawless skate with less flair.... maybe a minor mistake... but with two major mistakes and a few minor hickups, I'd expect 10 percent less, perhaps more....
that's what I am trying to convey here....
of course people say it's nationals... but it still has an influence on the ever growing PCS scores.... and how they are less and less meaningful in terms of an absolute numeral value but more in terms of ranking scale....
so that's all I have to say about this
kuddos to the 3 podium boys! looking forward to seeing them again...
for me there is no point comparing Yuzu's score with the others at this competition... do i believe he should have been scored less high? YES... do i believe he was not deserving to win.... NO WAY....
it's just sending the wrong message to give scores that are near perfect to someone's pretty much worst skate of the season in LP.
that's the point we are making.... where is the sport going if the PSC are handed so generously.... almost without a difference on whether or not a skater was flawless or not....
for me, 3% less than GPF would mean, a flawless skate with less flair.... maybe a minor mistake... but with two major mistakes and a few minor hickups, I'd expect 10 percent less, perhaps more....
that's what I am trying to convey here....
of course people say it's nationals... but it still has an influence on the ever growing PCS scores.... and how they are less and less meaningful in terms of an absolute numeral value but more in terms of ranking scale....
so that's all I have to say about this
kuddos to the 3 podium boys! looking forward to seeing them again...
I applaud and welcome your reasoned arguments, made in terms of the actual PCS criteria.
I think you have some valid points - particularly "involvement" (and as per my earlier posts I actually thought there might be a case to be made).
However, I'm not convinced the impact of the other aspects you mentioned are that great, considering the program as a whole. The falls were not lengthy, and he was back on his feet, and back to speed very quickly - then right back into the choreography, and back in time with the music. Overall, I think he still maintained a very high level of Projection, Carriage, and Clarity.
What do you think his PE score should have been? He got 9.43 here, and 10.00 at GPF... and bearing in mind eg. Mura got 8.32 and Uno got 8.96.
And how much difference would it have made to his overal score?
Now you're talking.
I think you are focussing too heavily on the mistakes though, which were not that numerous or lengthy...
In terms of the overall program and performance, he still demonstrated very high SS, TR, PE, CH, IN outside of the falls ie. for the majority of the time. According to the criteria for each of those components. There is something to be said for a reduction in PCS (and I did say there may be a case for this, early on)... but given the quality of the program outside of the falls, I don't think any overscoring is so significant as to be called "egregious".
ouch…
