There'd be no point in announcing that Team Captain's can choose "up to five" nominees when in reality, they were pressured to choose exactly three in every case. The only reasons I can think of would be: to deceive fans into believing the selection process would be more expansive, or to suit the whims of whoever was running the show rather than allowing the fans to have options. What makes 'three' a good number, in your opinion?
Oddly enough, you were just debating with me in here about a week ago about how the Team Captains could 'make the voting more interesting' by altering the number of nominees. Now, you are speculating that this option may have been completely taken away from the Captains. Does this make the voting less interesting now?
I never said that my opinion is/was that three is a good number.
What I said (in so many words) is that now that we have seen the ballot of three nominees per category, it is reasonable to conclude that it prob. was recommended to the team captains that three would be a good number.
As you will remember, I previously brought up the possibility of two nominees being more interesting b/c you -- oddly enough

-- scoffed at my comments that perhaps fewer than five nominations would be made per category.
For certain pairings of two nominees, I do think it would potentially be more interesting to have just two going head to head.
I haven't checked the results recently, but Boyang vs. Misha head to head potentially would be more interesting than Boyang vs. Misha vs. Han, IMO.
"Up to five" is an arbitrary requirement. Why not "up to six" or "up to four"?
So the fact that three is an arbitrary number is not upsetting to me. YMMV.
As you previously noted, the maximum number of nominees this year in the case of the Team North America ladies was three.
Who knows, maybe that is the reason that three eventually was deemed to be a good number that was desirable for all categories this year??? Maybe not??? We could speculate about anything and everything
ad infinitum.