- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
On the latest episode of the Ice Talk podcast, Phil Hersh and Jackie Wong spent a lot of time discussing the legacy of Mao Asada. (Seriously, Phil is so knowledgeable and has such immense respect and appreciation for the icons of the sport and its history - I'll just say it, I'm a Phil Hersh fan.)
One of the points they discussed quite a bit is Mao's 3A. Mao's 3A didn't push the sport as hard as it could have because she didn't have a 3Lz, which meant that she was still very beatable. Other ladies didn't necessarily also have to have a 3A to beat her. And while ladies are currently pushing the sport in regards to stamina with backloading, the 3A progression has been sooooo slow from Midori Ito until now. We have Rika Kihara and Liza Tukt, but it's evident that the 3A is not on the radar of the vast majority of the ladies at the top of the sport. Even with a risky move like the 3A, it still may not be enough to win, considering the comparative value of just having other jumps in the second half.
Basically, Phil and Jackie seemed to agree that the 3A value should be raised for ladies only in order to get more ladies willing to do the jump in competition. I personally don't like the idea of a skater like Liza (slow, sometimes not-so-good choreo, weak spins) beating more complete skaters like Evgenia/Kaetlyn on the basis of one jump, but I also think the 3A value for ladies is really not high enough.
Thoughts?
One of the points they discussed quite a bit is Mao's 3A. Mao's 3A didn't push the sport as hard as it could have because she didn't have a 3Lz, which meant that she was still very beatable. Other ladies didn't necessarily also have to have a 3A to beat her. And while ladies are currently pushing the sport in regards to stamina with backloading, the 3A progression has been sooooo slow from Midori Ito until now. We have Rika Kihara and Liza Tukt, but it's evident that the 3A is not on the radar of the vast majority of the ladies at the top of the sport. Even with a risky move like the 3A, it still may not be enough to win, considering the comparative value of just having other jumps in the second half.
Basically, Phil and Jackie seemed to agree that the 3A value should be raised for ladies only in order to get more ladies willing to do the jump in competition. I personally don't like the idea of a skater like Liza (slow, sometimes not-so-good choreo, weak spins) beating more complete skaters like Evgenia/Kaetlyn on the basis of one jump, but I also think the 3A value for ladies is really not high enough.
Thoughts?

