If Mirai lands 2 more 3As, gets in the top 5, and maybe medals at Worlds, is she the next lady to enter the USFS Hall of Fame?
Might be a good thread, after worlds. Hughes, Kwan and Cohen are all in. Next generation Czisny, Wagner, Gold, Nagasu?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Mirai lands 2 more 3As, gets in the top 5, and maybe medals at Worlds, is she the next lady to enter the USFS Hall of Fame?
Mirai just had a clean run-thru of her SP! Everything rotated!
According to the draw procedure for ISU Championships and OWG, Bradie could have ended up anywhere from #1 to #15 in the OWG start order.
https://isu.org/inside-single-pair-skating-ice-dance/figure-skating-rules/regulations-rules-fs (pp. 88-89)
So happened that Bradie drew to skate first.
Explanation:
Based on ISU World Standings, the thirty OWG entries are divided into two groups: a "skating later" group of fifteen and a "skating earlier" group of fifteen.
Bradie is #43 on the World Standings list.
Of the thirty OWG entries, at least twenty are higher on the WS list than Bradie.
So she was in the "skating earlier" group.
There was a random draw among the fifteen in the "skating earlier" group to determine positions #1 thru #15 in the start order.
(The determination of positions #16 thru #30 is slightly more complex. I'm not going to go into that explanation.)

Poor Bradie--this is the downside to coming out of the blue--if only the U.S. had realized what it had on its hands, she could have had a third assignment earlier on to help her standing.
had no control over a potential second GP assignment for Bradie.
Not true. Let's just leave it at that.
If you have non-hearsay proof that USFS was responsible for denying Bradie a chance at a second GP, please share.
This also is not true. Just you sent you a PM.
Have not received your PM. In any case, what I meant was that I was asking you to share any proof in the thread.
Anyway, I think you are saying that it is "not true" that USFS was responsible for denying Bradie a second GP assignment.
If you were saying the opposite, then I again expect you to back up what you are saying by sharing non-hearsay proof here in the thread that USFS was responsible.
... USFS was not in the wrong here (maybe not in other cases but not here).