- Joined
- Mar 23, 2018
This concept seems hard to grasp for many people though even for ballet fans. Last time, I was reading comments on a Natalia Osipiva rehearsal videos. "Not elegant enough", "her movements are rushed", "she can only do one style". They just do seem capable to appreciate her for what she brings to ballet, including her mesmerizing Giselle or her exhuberant Kitri. I honestly wonder WHO, today, in any discipline is a real cameleon, capable of being ANYONE, change their body language, their facial expressions, they way they react naturally to music and fool everyone around. I certainly have NONE at the top of my head at the moment and I don't know if I'll find one. We are who we are and trying to change that is almost impossible. Chassez le naturel et il revient au galop.This has been discussed ad nauseam. My thought on this still is: none of the music they used in the past four years are of the same style, and their choreo certainly responded to the music well, so what same style "again"? Baryshnikov will always move like Baryshnikov weather he dances Petipa, Balanchine or Twyla Tharp. He's not going to move like Beyonce. I don't remember there being such a complaint about Meryl and Charlie even though they always skated to dramatic operatic music and adhered to one style of movement.
I agree with this. I kinda wish they did more with the editing. Right now it's just a rather simple segue.
Lol I can't take him seriously, but after hearing this, I did find that G's legs no longer seem as long as I thought they looked. But this only confirms your last point, which is that how you use your body and project a line matters more than anything else. If Bukin or Kastalapov has longer legs, I'm not seeing it.
And trying to hard is only going to look uneasy and weird.
They already have the SD to show "versatility" and it's also made possible because the COP gives specific rules, patters and requirements, just like in ballroom dancing.
But in the free, you are completely free. There is nothing you can count on to "do the work" for you. Some skaters need a back story from a movie, a ballet or opera. Some don't. Some just don't even want to do it because it's not them.
I certainly think the exceptional combination of pliancy and strength is what distinguishes them from all others, and that combination is both a physical gift and something that their coaches over the years wisely encouraged and amplified.
Definitely. Coaches saw the potential and worked on it wisely. But it's incredibly unfair to Guillaume when commentators imply that "he's just a natural". Like, he doesn't deserve to get there.


:ddevil: