What you're saying is the judges should judge based on "reputation scoring", instead of an actual performance.
I strongly disagree. I think the reputational scoring (and resulting enormous bias, and perception of crooked judging!) is the main reason why the fans have been leaving this sport in droves.
Scores based on reputation, scores to promote Fed's favorites - herein lies THE ROT at the heart of ISU and national federations.
As a casual observer, I don't give a flying fig about the Fed's preferences, or the judges darlings, or a skater defying expectations due to a particularly good or a bad day and thus inconveniencing a preferred narrative... However, I do care deeply about fairness.
When I see that judging, for some inexplicable reason, is not in fact based on the day of the performance, AND ONLY on the day of performance, but rather on "reputation" - which often means some super-inflated (or super-depressed) prior "established" scores - I don't get it. What is it - public sport, or a private corrupt club?