- Joined
- Jul 11, 2003
What about adding a half loop into the sequence so as to get into a flip or salchow and leave the toeloop out of it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be awesome.What about adding a half loop into the sequence so as to get into a flip or salchow and leave the toeloop out of it?
So a skater could do 3A+3T, 3Lz+3T, 3F+3T, 3Lo+3T and 3S+3T, all in the same program?A jump may be done in combination with different jumps an unlimited number of times.
So a skater could do 3A+3T, 3Lz+3T, 3F+3T, 3Lo+3T and 3S+3T, all in the same program?
Actually my dream (if the ISU wants to ask me) re-writing of the Zayak rule would be (referring only to jumps of 3 or more revolutions and not distinguishing quads from triples)
A jump may be done in combination with different jumps an unlimited number of times.
If it's done in combination with itself as in (4t/3t) it may be done one more time in combination with a different jump.
A jump performed by itself can appear in combination (with a different jump) once.

My biggest fear if that happened is Tara Lipinski would suddenly reinstate and be unbeatable by racking up points doing every other triple (minus the triple axel) with a triple loop on the end.![]()


I just checked some old sp's and you're absolutely right. I have no idea what I was thinking of (I probably got some things mixed up).
I'm not backing down from my assertion that two triple or quad toeloops is plenty in any program. If a skater opens up an lp with a 4/3 toeloop combination I don't want to see any more toeloops (that are more than 2 revolutions) from them in that program.
I'm afraid that's exactly what it would do -- take away the quad/triple combo altogether....It also means that if you want to put two quads in the program you'll need two different types of quad or to do a 4/2...
I think there is the possibility that it would make skaters less innovative instead of more. I think every skater (if they were able) would just do 4T+2T, 4T, 3A+2T, 3A, 3Lz+3T, 3F+2Lo+2Lo, 3Lo, 3S. If they got lazy they could change their last two passes into double Axels (thus doing only four kinds of jumps) and only lose 2.5 points.I think that it would force skaters to use their jumps more wisely and be forced into coming up with varied jump combinations/sequences to use the maximum jumping passes and not do 4 types of the same jump as they currently can (and do).
I'm afraid that's exactly what it would do -- take away the quad/triple combo altogether.I think there is the possibility that it would make skaters less innovative instead of more. I think every skater (if they were able) would just do 4T+2T, 4T, 3A+2T, 3A, 3Lz+3T, 3F+2Lo+2Lo, 3Lo, 3S. If they got lazy they could change their last two passes into double Axels (thus doing only four kinds of jumps) and only lose 2.5 points.
Oops. My bad.Mathman, you now have 3 toe loop jumps of 3 or more revolutions... and unless I misunderstood, that wouldn't work within the system that's being thought out, because the 4/2 is being used specifically because there is a limit of 2 jumps of same nature of 3 revolutions or more...
Great point. :yes:Even before COP those attempting 3A were rewarded above those not trying them. A lot of skaters who fell or 2 footed the 3A were placed ahead of a clean program that didn't have a 3A attempt.
That's a horrible rule (the new Zayak idea), sorry.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with a jump layout that includes 2 Quad Toes and 2 Triple Toes in combination. It's really exciting when people can pull that off, actually.