Well. That was my point.
It has nothing to do with the "Kwan era." My argument is that novice and junior championships aren't an indicator of senior success. So you haven't heard of those names. Those wouldn't be the new talents. They'd be the old ones... the ones who HAD won medals in the 6.0 system, the ones the judges would have been familiar with, the ones they had seen winning at previous Nationals.
Look at it backwards: Michelle Kwan, Sasha Cohen, Jennifer Kirk, Angela Nikodinov, Tara Lipinski, Nicole Bobek, Tonia Kwiatkowski, Nancy Kerrigan, Tonya Harding, Kristi Yamaguchi, Debi Thomas, Caryn Kadavy, Tiffany Chin, Linda Fratianne... you recognize these names right? NONE of them were Junior Ladies Champions. NONE of them were novice ladies champions. ALL of them won at least one medal at the senior level. (Kristi Yamaguchi was junior PAIRS champion, though).
It feels like people are combing through club competitions, YouTube vids, looking for the youngest little jumpers, the most precocious artists, so that they can say, "That's the ONE. That's the one who is going to be the next Olympic Champion." And odds are, no. She's not. And odds are, they just missed watching some pretty cool skating from a bunch of other skaters. And what's the point? Are they people who are actually interested in figure skating? Or are they people who are just racing to be able to say, "I saw her first."
Why put that kind of pressure on a 13 year old? I'd so much rather to say to someone, "I really enjoyed your skating today -- that's a great program and you were totally on with the jumpss," than "You are so good, I bet you win the Olympics some day." Because with the first, that's praise for something they've already accomplished. With the second, it's making them think that if they don't stay on track to win the Olympics, they will have accomplished nothing.