A genuine question not related to any recent statement here but rather sth I get from reading through this platform: Why do some posters insist that Medvedeva has improved since leaving Eteri?
She has reworked her 2A and when she lands it, it is improved indeed (not when she falls tho) and had tried to improve the flutz but other than that there is only regression...?
She is slower, her spins have gotten worse, sometimes she doesn't get the levels anymore, programs have been simplified, less transitions, she is very inconsistent.
The interpretation part is subjective. I do think it has improved cause she has finally stopped the miming, but the miming had nothing to do with her old coaches cause she was the only one in that group doing that do the extent that it was at.
So while there may be one or two things that have improved, overall she has clearly regressed to the point of not even making the GPF.
Now I'm not saying this regression is to blame on Orser or that it would never have happened had she stayed with Eteri. It would probably have happened under any circumstance cause her technique cannot sustain her new body, injuries etc. And maybe Eteri did recommend her to retire. But not cause she was done with her, but rather cause she could see in which direction it was going?
It's not her fault, neither her new coach's. But I do wonder why people keep pushing the narrative that she "has improved so much" and "makes great progress" etc ?