2020-21 Russian Ladies' Figure Skating | Page 430 | Golden Skate

2020-21 Russian Ladies' Figure Skating

Status
Not open for further replies.
I shouldn't be talking about the men, but comparing some of their programs to Sasha....Nathan/Yuzuru with 5 quads was just as much of a training drill as anything I've ever seen. Especially Yuzuru. Yes yes their skating skills are better, but they're getting +9s across the board for training drill programs and no one says anything. To be honest I don't know about the no one says anything part, just sounds good.
 
I know it may be off the topic. But Uno doesn't have 4Lz. As a matter of fact, he doesn't even have 3Lz in either of his short and free programs. I guess it's because he flutz?
Agree. :) Anna Shcherbakova has never jumped a real Lz jump either. But she receives full credit for her 3lutz and 4Lutz. Last year she jumped 2 3Lutzes and 2 4Lutzes all of them with flat edge and at least half a turn pre-rotation.
 
Davydov suddenly 'loosing interest' in Muravyova doesn't grace his resume in my opinion, to the point of completely abandoning her mid season so she had to train and compete on her own in last year's Russian Cup.
Is this the same Sofia Muravieva who was 2nd at the Russian Cup state last weekend? She's a really good skater, I can't understand why anyone would dump her.
 
Agree. :) Anna Shcherbakova has never jumped a real Lz jump either. But she receives full credit for her 3lutz and 4Lutz. Last year she jumped 2 3Lutzes and 2 4Lutzes all of them with flat edge and at least half a turn pre-rotation.
What is a "real Lutz" according to the rules, anyway?
 
Outside edge and minimal pre-rotation.
Actually, the rules just say a "Lutz is taken-off from backward outside edge". They do not mention anything about pre-rotation on a pick nullifying a lutz.

It is silly to suggest Anna has never jumped a lutz according to the rules, given the tons of protocols that contradict such an assertion. If you want to adamantly keep criticizing her as pre-rotating and not having a true lutz, you're entitled to your opinion... but the rules do not align with said opinion.
 
Here's the thing - a true lutz only requires an outside edge and straight entrance I believe. But if you are to say a true triple lutz, then that means minimal pre-rotation. The ISU has deductions for "forward takeoff", but it seems that up into 180 degrees PR, everything is considered to be fine.
 
Actually, the rules just say a "Lutz is taken-off from backward outside edge". They do not mention anything about pre-rotation on a pick nullifying a lutz.

It is silly to suggest Anna has never jumped a lutz according to the rules, given the tons of protocols that contradict such an assertion. If you want to adamantly keep criticizing her as pre-rotating and not having a true lutz, you're entitled to your opinion... but the rules do not align with said opinion.
I agree that the idea of Anna never having jumped a correct lutz is far too much of a hyperbole. She probably has done shallow outside edge lutzes, and those are very much "true" lutzes. But protocols are not rules, for PR, there are actual restrictions on how much PR a jump should have, it's just that judges don't really care. That leads to the question, if judges are supposed to follow rules, and they do, but not the ones written down on paper, then what are the true rules? The ones in the ISU handbooks, or the ones that judges seem to follow?
 
I agree that the idea of Anna never having jumped a correct lutz is far too much of a hyperbole. She probably has done shallow outside edge lutzes, and those are very much "true" lutzes. But protocols are not rules, for PR, there are actual restrictions on how much PR a jump should have, it's just that judges don't really care. That leads to the question, if judges are supposed to follow rules, and they do, but not the ones written down on paper, then what are the true rules? The ones in the ISU handbooks, or the ones that judges seem to follow?

There is not a single mention of "pre-rotation" in this. And no, a cheated takeoff is different than a pre-rotated jump (a toe axel is different than a pre-rotated toe loop). The only place where a judge could arguably take of marks for pre-rotation is lower GOE for poor takeoff and even that isn't specified as to whether pre-rotation constitutes that. There is nowhere that explicitly states that excessive pre-rotation (everyone, of course, having their own personal opinion on what is "excessive") on a jump nullifies it.


Also, everyone has their own opinion but I tend to cut skaters slack if they don't have a "true" lutz as in one that has a definitive outside edge. For all intents and purposes, they're still doing a lutz, but it's just poorly executed. YMMV.
 
Last edited:
There is not a single mention of "pre-rotation" in this. And no, a cheated takeoff is different than a pre-rotated jump (a toe axel is different than a pre-rotated toe loop). The only place where a judge could arguably take of marks for pre-rotation is lower GOE for poor takeoff and even that isn't specified as to whether pre-rotation constitutes that. There is nowhere that explicitly states that excessive pre-rotation (everyone, of course, having their own personal opinion on what is "excessive") on a jump nullifies it.


Also, everyone has their own opinion but I tend to cut skaters slack if they don't have a "true" lutz as in one that has a definitive outside edge. For all intents and purposes, they're still doing a lutz, but it's just poorly executed. YMMV.
"A clear forward (backward for Axel type jump) take-off will be considered as a downgraded jump. The toe loop is the most commonly cheated on take-off jump. The TP may only watch the replay in regular speed to determine the cheat and downgrade on the take off (more often in combinations or sequences)."

A clear forward jump will be considered downgraded. If a skater pre-rotates 180 degrees, they will be taking off facing forward, rather than backward as takeoffs for most jumps (save for axel) are. I mean technically, there's no such thing is 0 PR, but skaters with less than 179 degrees would technically not be penalized since they aren't definitely taking off facing forward.
 
I was prompted to search out some clips of 60's vintage Lutz jumps with the old style curved entry. A thing of beauty that I might guess no one has jumped in many years.
Watch Alexia Paganini. :) She has great lutz. (And according to me she is currently the most beautiful ladies skater after Alyona Kostornaya).
 
Last edited:
I was prompted to search out some clips of 60's vintage Lutz jumps with the old style curved entry. A thing of beauty that I might guess no one has jumped in many years.
Back then they were only doing double Lutzes (or even singles). I think that for a triple Lutz -- never mind a quad -- just getting in three rotations is so hard that they can't worry too much about technique or style.

Sonia Henie had a wonderful single Lutz, rotated in the opposite direection from her other jumps and spins.
 
Back then they were only doing double Lutzes (or even singles). I think that for a triple Lutz -- never mind a quad -- just getting in three rotations is so hard that they can't worry too much about technique or style.

Sonia Henie had a wonderful single Lutz, rotated in the opposite direection from her other jumps and spins.
It is hard, I agree. But there are still skaters with textbook lutz technique like Alexia Paganini. Her 3Lz is gorgeous. And there is Veronika Zhilina who jumped 4Lz with minimal pre-rotation (however the jump was underrotated).
And guess what, Alexia receives much smaller GOE for her gorgeous 3Lz than those with horrific 3Lz technique. Reputation judging.
Edit: I read that "e" on a flip or lutz jump means 30% less BV, so I guess excessive pre-rotation on flip or lutz (more than 180 degrees for sure) should also mean 30% less BV, the skaters with unclear edge on flip or lutz should have 15% less BV and those with more than 90 degrees pre-rotation on flip or lutz - 15 % less BV.
Also - the judges are rewarding with huge GOE skaters who have jumps with small height and distance. Even though this is againts the rules. This needs to stop.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mdl
"A clear forward (backward for Axel type jump) take-off will be considered as a downgraded jump. The toe loop is the most commonly cheated on take-off jump. The TP may only watch the replay in regular speed to determine the cheat and downgrade on the take off (more often in combinations or sequences)."

A clear forward jump will be considered downgraded. If a skater pre-rotates 180 degrees, they will be taking off facing forward, rather than backward as takeoffs for most jumps (save for axel) are. I mean technically, there's no such thing is 0 PR, but skaters with less than 179 degrees would technically not be penalized since they aren't definitely taking off facing forward.
I agree. The technical definition of take-off in the English language literally means moment you leave the ground....in this case the ground is ice. So if you're prerotating and the moment you leave the ice is facing forwards, I don't understand why it shouldn't count as forward take-off. In the end, no ISU technical caller sees the rules this way so they must mean something else. But they should rewrite the rule since as it stands they aren't following their own rules.
 
There was a Twitter thread I read once (can't find it now 🙃) that explained, with statistics of different skaters across several competitions, how skaters with very clear outside lutz edge are more likely to have a lip and viceversa for skaters with good flips having flutz.
Basically, it's very rare to find a skater who has both a "textbook" lutz and flip, and even more as the number of jump rotations increase.

I don't know if the ISU should try to be more strict about these details as obsessively as some fans are. Maybe it's one of those situations where you would potentially sacrifice technical development of the sport for the sake of being super strict about "correct" technique and you would end up giving out calls like candies.
In the end, the technical panel decides whether a lutz is a "real" lutz or not.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top