- Joined
- Aug 11, 2018
OK. Ask yourself the question: why does ISU not ratify results in domestic competitions? IMO, because there is no hope for the objectivity of the protocols. Everyone understands this. So, this 4Lz that you are pointing to was very Ur. And this is indisputable. He would not get ratification in international competitions. The first 4Lz of Trusova was not ratified precisely for this reason, although it was performed better.I'm not the original poster - Flanker was. And I disagree that he was insulting, if anything I think you're being rather rude and insulting.
I do not and do not desire to give Anna a priority at least in some kind of jump. I'm merely stating the facts. You argued that she wasn't the first one to land a ratified 4Lz. I merely corrected you and said she was (just not the first one internationally.) Those are facts. You're the one that's needlessly trying to put a skater down.
Then let's look at the pre-season skates as a kind of Russian competition. Why can't we? There were also spectators and judges, the whole world could see it. After all, it is important to performance of the jump is not in training. This was not a training session. Let's ratify this. Why not? Probably because it does not fit into a convenient paradigm? There is no reason for me to humiliate Anna's achievements. They are great and undeniable. But I don't like it when tell a lie, when they do it not by mistake, but deliberately. In making the brackets of relevant circumstances.

