First of all, I have defended Anna here. I suggest you do some reading before jumping to judgements and conclusions - the same ones you seem to be urging others to take.
If you were right in one case it does not mean that you are not wrong in others.
Thirdly, it remains to be seen if it was a calculated risk. That's what I've argued. That's the whole point, that you are, repeatedly, missing. We still don't know the long-term outcomes of allowing her to skate. Same with Sasha, Liza, etc.
And because all information (especially health condition) will never be fully open to public, it is possible for you to argue without limits, forever. There is always a place to "raise concern", always something is "to be seen". Never enough.
That's my point you are repeatedly missing.
So we don't have all the information to make a decision on if it was a needless risk.
Here is what we do know:
1.She is a 16 year old girl. So her parents are still legally her guardians.
I do not how about Australia, but in Russia parents cannot lock their 16 year old child at home, it's a crime.
2. Before RusNats began we knew that RusNats would be viewed as a "motivational camp" and not the sole determining factor for the World's team - unlike most years. So withdrawal wouldn't be a nail in the coffin in her career. (In fact, of the 4 2020 Euros champions that Russia had, only B/K did NOT withdraw from RusNats 2021. Aliona, for example, had already withdrawn.)
Anna thought differently (based on her interview prior to RusNat). For her it was very important to be there and not only because of Worlds.
3. She, at the very minimum, had a fever the day before her FS.
Do you have proof of that? It is really interesting where it comes from.
Well, I asked several times, checked multiply sources and was unable to find any proof of this. There is 1 very badly written article by rt-sport journalist where mentioned that "after pneumonia" she had a pattern of her body temperature raise to 38 at the evening for many days. Not during her Short, just "while recovering". And several articles that referenced rt-sport AND saying "that guy said she skated with 38", basically.
AND we have a clear statement from Gorshkov that Anna DID NOT skate with temperature, they had thermometers near rink.
So for me 3 is not "very minimum". If you can provide some credible source it would be nice.
She was not at her best form, it is obvious, she was lacking stamina. But still she finished her SP, did not fall, did not faint, nothing except "heavy breathing" that was gone after 5 min.
That's the only point I can fully agree.
5. And this is the most important one. By her OWN words, EVERYONE advised her to withdraw. This includes her parents (who are her legal guardians), her coaches, AND her doctor. And while, yes, you are right, that WE don't have any data about her health, they - parents, doctors, coaches - DO. In fact they have all of it and, even up to the 6 minute FS warm up, they STILL asked her to withdraw.
And? It is her life, her decision. In an interview her mother told "it is important to allow children to make mistakes".
Everybody (probably you too) says that Anna is very intelligent and smart - so why do you not trust her?
Yes, all advised her to withdraw - but do you know why? I doubt that reason was "there is a a real risk you will never will be able to skate". In her interview (prior RusNat) answering reporter question "what if, may be better to withdraw?" she talks about "may be I do not finish program due to lack of stamina but I have to try". Eteri also talked about stamina.
That "risk" - "do not finish program due to lack of stamina" for me does not sounds too high. And for Anna too.