- Joined
- Sep 22, 2019
Maybe it depends on the coaching group? Mikhailov's group is doing ok (Trusova, Muravieva). Volkov's group is mixed (Kovalev made good strides this season by men's standards. Ryabova and Konstantinova not). Rozanov's group is kind of confusing because the members of his group keep changing (Leonid Sviridenko struggled - Kostornaia too but she was impacted by numerous things).I'm wondering based on my limited view, if the problem at AOP is that its a collection of inexperienced coaches, yes Plushenko has a ton of experience as a skater but that doesn't translate automatically to 'great' coach especially right out of the gate. Where does inexperience really start to show - when things are going wrong and 2 of their 3 prominent/most talented skaters have struggled all season and they haven't really improved; perhaps its bad circumstances with a bit of a strange season and getting sick but perhaps its not...
The effect of inexperience might show more through organisational issues as opposed to coaching per se. Volkov's group (the most experienced, pre-dating AOP) was affected just before Nats by lack of ice access when the academy shifted to a new rink but his folks still trained in the old rented one. That messed up Artem Kovalev's performances at Nats and seems to have played a part in Ryabova and Konstantinova departing.
Sometime ago Alferova (Zhilina's mum) took on a more expanded role - she was initially just coaching some lower-level kids. I wonder if this was due to Lipnitskaia joining, as the latter works with the younger kids. There were intra-AoP coach shifts at various points in the season e.g. Shulskaya (from R to M), Zhilina and Sarnovsky (from M and R to A).
Trusova's environment has actually been relatively stable. She's been with Mikhailov since April based on training camp videos and interviews, stuck with the same programmes (give or take a few quads/3A) and besides a non-debilitating injury has been pretty healthy i.e. no COVID AFAIK. I guess it shows.
