Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But it is her country that is running this investigation in question. That's why I doubt their dedication to finding out the truth. I'd rather expect them to do whatever they can to find nothing. Partly because of the awards you mentioned.Well, it's politics after all, and i'm not sure i can talk about it. But if they have a problem with someone around here, i think it would be a country she represents, not her coaching team. Because her coaching team already have a lot of recognitions by the multiple organizations and skating community and ISU itself.
And we should accept the system, just because the system tells us what is right?1. Your personal belief is not, and should not, influence whatever system is set up for evaluation. If the system says, you test positive and you are out until otherwise proven, that is the system.
If it is easier to you to believe in the system and not to the real people, thats you, not me. We are just different.It is RUSSADA who listened to her case because they were the one to charge her in first place, and after her testimony they realized that she is not guilty, simple as that. Now the other organizations made an appeal against it because they didn't hear what RUSSADA heard. But what RUSSADA heard from Kamila can be a legit after all, and after they hear her case those other organizations can agree with it (or not).But it is her country that is running this investigation in question. That's why I doubt their dedication to finding out the truth. I'd rather expect them to do whatever they can to find nothing. Partly because of the awards you mentioned.
No, you should not. Russia should set up its own competitions under their own rules, and invite other like-minded nations to show us all how things should be done.And we should accept that system, just because the system tells us what is right?![]()
Yes. Excellent point. It took 8 months to track down the source of the contamination. I could have taken longer if there hadn't been an earlier case involving the same substance. Jessica was banned from competition (and I believe from receiving funds from USFS) in the meantime.Calalang / Johnson were banned from competing at Worlds 2021, and the banned substance turned out to be in her eyelash serum. She was cleared 8 months later. By the same token, Kamila should be excluded from the Olympic Women's competition pending final disposition of the matter.
But it is her country that is running this investigation in question. That's why I doubt their dedication to finding out the truth. I'd rather expect them to do whatever they can to find nothing. Partly because of the awards you mentioned.
I do agree.That thought crossed my mind too.
Well, I would like you to be right and myself to be wrong. But atm I doubt it. We'll see.I'm not quite so sure about that. This episode has led me to read some Russian sports media with more attention than I have in the past. There is a slight, but ongoing, shift in the perspectives of the articles and of the general public who comment on those articles.
Initally, it was like the five stages of grief. Denial, anger, bargaining, and so forth. But I believe a general sense of acceptance is slowly settling in, and some Russian journalists and fans are now genuinely seeking answers. The "dastardly West is conspiring to destroy our girl" storyline is no longer getting the traction it did a few days ago.
Now, it's more of "a child was drugged, and we want to know who did it. And then we're going to make them pay."
And we should accept that system, just because the system tells us what is right?If it is easier to you to believe in the system and not to the real people, thats you, not me. We are just different.
In every system, there are exceptions of the rules. That was my point. Mine and Jessica Callalang's. And yes, based on her case and this case where the results were late like a month, where they didn't actually care about a person, whoever that person is, my conclusion is - the system is badIf you do not like the system, do not compete under it. After person has chosen to compete under the system and signed the documents saying they'll abide by it, they don't get out of abiding by the rules by going "Oh, system so bad"
I do not believe that is a sign of independence, but rather an after the fact excuse.
The matter should be dealt with within the guidelines and rules currently set up.

the worst option is if Kamila simply does not know how the drug could get to her. That is, she does not just say that she does not know, but really does not know. Then it will be a complete analogue of the case with the curler Krushelnitsky at the last Olympics. He said at the time that he did not understand how meldonium could have ended up in his system. And this seems to be true, because such drugs cannot help curling in any way. It's almost like a chess player taking anabolic steroids.It is RUSSADA who listened to her case because they were the one to charge her in first place, and after her testimony they realized that she is not guilty, simple as that. Now the other organizations made an appeal against it because they didn't hear what RUSSADA heard. But what RUSSADA heard from Kamila can be a legit after all, and after they hear her case those other organizations can agree with it (or not).
Valieva is a minor so the threshold for fault or negligence is already lower. Does she have a responsibility to check the drugs that were given to her? Unless she acquired the drug herself with her family in a shady way, if she was given the drug by the National Team doctor and didn't know then I don't see how she would have any Fault or Negligence.
Regardless of being concerned about how the rules apply differently to adults and children, the way things stand now with the law is it within the rules to ban her in that scenario? I don't know of any instance for an athlete being banned when they have no Fault or Negligence themselves.
I am glad to hear this.I'm not quite so sure about that. This episode has led me to read some Russian sports media with more attention than I have in the past. There is a slight, but ongoing, shift in the perspectives of the articles and of the general public who comment on those articles.
Initally, it was like the five stages of grief. Denial, anger, bargaining, and so forth. But I believe a general sense of acceptance is slowly settling in, and some Russian journalists and fans are now genuinely seeking answers. The "dastardly West is conspiring to destroy our girl" storyline is no longer getting the traction it did a few days ago.
Now, it's more of "a child was drugged, and we want to know who did it. And then we're going to make them pay."
And lots of allegations about doping in the pastWell, it's politics after all, and i'm not sure i can talk about it. But if they have a problem with someone around here, i think it would be a country she represents, not her coaching team. Because her coaching team already have a lot of recognitions by the multiple organizations and skating community and ISU itself.