Is 4 years ban really that long considering how bad this case is? Have people forgotten that Sotskova got 10 years ban for forging a medical document? The cases who got 2 years were mild cases were there were very small amounts of drugs in comparision and more convincing story how it ended up in the body
I think it's really difficult to compare cases. The usual ban is indeed rather 2 years. But it depends on a lot of factors and it's absolutely not as if 4 years are unheard of. Recently Halep got a 4 year ban. But every case is different. There are 6 months - or even 3 months bans, there are lifelong bans.
This is what's in the document:
It was therefore a matter for the CAS Panel to consider what sanctions, if any, should be imposed on
Ms Valieva pursuant to the Russian ADR, bearing in mind that, in the absence of grounds for elimination,
reduction or suspension, the Russian ADR provide for a four-year period of ineligibility. In order to
benefit from a reduced period of ineligibility, Ms Valieva needed to prove, by a balance of probabilities
that she had not intentionally committed the ADRV by engaging in conduct which she knew constituted
an ADRV or in conduct where she knew that there was a significant risk that said conduct might
constitute or result in an ADRV and had manifestly disregarded that risk. Having carefully considered
all the evidence put before it, the CAS Panel concluded that Ms Valieva was not able to establish, on the
balance of probabilities and on the basis of the evidence before the Panel, that she had not committed the
ADRV intentionally (within the meaning of the Russian ADR)
So the way I understand it with the way Valieva's side presented the case it was never a question of two years or four years, it was all or nothing.