The commentators did what they’re supposed to do: point out strengths and weaknesses. The Canadian commentators rightly praised the Georgian female skater’s jumps, throws, skating quality, and reliability, and it was fair to point out the obvious weaknesses in her partner’s skating. He is clearly the weakest male skater in the field for pair elements, and without her he would not have the same success. This was also not one of their stronger performances—they looked disconnected from the music and each other and had several small trips and stumbles.
Sandra, while not a commentator I enjoy, is well-qualified to speak about choreography and overall structure and often sees the bigger picture. I think some of the reaction comes from what we’re now used to: safer, more positive commentary from people like Mark Hanretty (who is actually my favorite commentator of all time) and Ted Barton, especially through their work with junior skaters.
Commentary in the 90s and earlier was far more direct. Scott Hamilton openly commented on skaters’ conditioning, Barb Underhill frequently criticized choreography, costuming, music choice, and technique, and Dick Button and Peggy Fleming were famously blunt—often disagreeing with judges, calling out missed calls, and even arguing on air.
Today, commentators almost never ditectly challenge a rotation call or a placement result other than saying well that was a bit generous or something like that. Back in the day Barb Underhill would have had no problem pointing out flaws, errors, and just things that she disagreed with. Sandra comes from that older school. I don’t like her style, and she may have been harsh on the Georgians today, but I appreciate that she didn’t sugarcoat real weaknesses.