The most obvious question is whether it is even possible to reduce injury incidence in sports. My impression is that whenever someone tries to do something to make a sport safer, people find other dangerous things to do, or take advantage of a safety mechanism to do more dangerous things.
When all is said and done, I think athletes are willing to accept some raTE of injury, and maybe even death, and no matter what you do, they will act in ways so as to go back to be within that range. I can't prove that it is impossible to reduce injuries, but I suspect it.
Look at the injury incidence of Rugby vs American Football (not soccer). Two very similar sports. Except that American Football uses helmets, and lots of padding, while Rugby is performed without protection (though both sports use mouthguards), and Rugby has more minutes of play / game, with fewer and perhaps shorter stops. Yet the injury incidence per game is similar.
An example within the figure skating community would be Ice Dance. It can be argued that it came into existence to reduce injury incidence, relative to freestyle skating, by largely eliminating jumps. But instead, dangerous lifts partly brought back the injury incidence. E.g., see
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6204632
(It IS true that in that study, freestyle skaters have a higher total injury incidence - but ice dancers have a higher acute incidence.
Of course, that study might be biased by several effects - e.g., I think ice dancers tend to be older than freestyle skaters. They may also tend to be people who started out as freestyle skaters, and progressed to ice dance when the discovered they could not compete at the highest levels in freestyle. I had a coach with that history - and in between, she tried pairs, but discovered she could not compete at the highest levels of that either. Yet she always loved freestyle skating best. And she sort of implied she regretted switching; she was deeply disappointed when she didn't qualify for the Olympics - a very high bar for anyone to set for themselves.
Regardless, the differences between who participates in different figure skating disciplines may bias injury statistics.
BTW, based on
journals.lww.com/acsm-csmr/abstract/2024/10000/figure_skating_musculoskeletal_injury__evidence.3.aspx
it appears that figure skaters are willing to accept a fairly high injury rate. And I suspect this excludes most minor injuries like bruises, cuts, abrasions, and concussions that don't produce an obvious immediate long term effect. Most athletes don't report these sorts of thing.
When all is said and done, I think athletes are willing to accept some raTE of injury, and maybe even death, and no matter what you do, they will act in ways so as to go back to be within that range. I can't prove that it is impossible to reduce injuries, but I suspect it.
Look at the injury incidence of Rugby vs American Football (not soccer). Two very similar sports. Except that American Football uses helmets, and lots of padding, while Rugby is performed without protection (though both sports use mouthguards), and Rugby has more minutes of play / game, with fewer and perhaps shorter stops. Yet the injury incidence per game is similar.
An example within the figure skating community would be Ice Dance. It can be argued that it came into existence to reduce injury incidence, relative to freestyle skating, by largely eliminating jumps. But instead, dangerous lifts partly brought back the injury incidence. E.g., see
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6204632
(It IS true that in that study, freestyle skaters have a higher total injury incidence - but ice dancers have a higher acute incidence.
Of course, that study might be biased by several effects - e.g., I think ice dancers tend to be older than freestyle skaters. They may also tend to be people who started out as freestyle skaters, and progressed to ice dance when the discovered they could not compete at the highest levels in freestyle. I had a coach with that history - and in between, she tried pairs, but discovered she could not compete at the highest levels of that either. Yet she always loved freestyle skating best. And she sort of implied she regretted switching; she was deeply disappointed when she didn't qualify for the Olympics - a very high bar for anyone to set for themselves.
Regardless, the differences between who participates in different figure skating disciplines may bias injury statistics.
BTW, based on
journals.lww.com/acsm-csmr/abstract/2024/10000/figure_skating_musculoskeletal_injury__evidence.3.aspx
it appears that figure skaters are willing to accept a fairly high injury rate. And I suspect this excludes most minor injuries like bruises, cuts, abrasions, and concussions that don't produce an obvious immediate long term effect. Most athletes don't report these sorts of thing.