Grades of Execution and technical calls too can be manipulated, we can take the example of a (not competitively skating anymore) Skater who would always (always!) have an invalid Spin in the Short Program (deserving a V in the Free) and who was always given a Level 4 with a high GOE (which he wouldn't deserve for any Spin either, as far as I can remember). This uncalled Spin error alone would generate at every Competition, an undue bonus of five points in the Short Program and over two points in the Free, plus the overscoring on the other Spins and the undue Level 4 and high GOE on the Step Sequence... where Jason Brown was given only his due because he was really deserving his high scores on his Spins and Step Sequences. This, and not only inaccurate Component scoring, has long allowed a narrative of "technical inferiority" about Jason Brown while there was in fact a clear technical superiority. Jason Brown is an exceptional athlete, his athletic/technical superiority doesn't lay in Quadruple jumps but in everything else, that's all. In addition to the artistry, of course, which assessment makes only a small part of the Components, but while I do believe (maybe I don't know him well enough) that this artistic part is very important to him, I do believe too that he accepts very well that this is only a very small part of the scores and it will be assessed by not-very-artistic judges; and likes very much the athletic challenge in Competitive Figure Skating. I think that if this wasn't the case, he wouldn't be optimising that well his athletic assets in his programs. I believe that Rohene Ward wouldn't imagine such programs if it wasn't in full agreement with Jason Brown. He's so incredibly strong for perseverating in showing the athlete he is, in spite of the lack of reward!