I just think that it makes the results seem more fair, more "athletic" if the winner has a quad. This 8 Triple thingy is such a standard among so many competitors.
I assume that you mean if the winner has a quad and the rest are triples with no mistakes? Or do you really think Joubert should have won the world championships because he landed a quad - never mind the rest of his jumps?
This sport is about doing every element and doing it well. If you know that you are going to fall or have an error on a quad why do it? I don't want to see messy but risky programs win over clean technically challenging programs (which an 8 triple program is - who executed all eight plannned triples without error at these championships? Exactly one skater - the winner). An 8 triple program isn't the "standard". Skaters may attempt 8 triples but who actually ever lands all eight? Usually the winner!
Javier Fernandez landed one Triple more than Patrick Chan - Javi is 19th, Chan is 2nd. Of course Javi had some bobbles in there, but at the end of the day was the difference really that huge between Chan and Fernandez - 17 places? Chan got 21 points more PCS!
To me the differences between the performances are becoming too tiny, try to explain the 17 place difference between Fernandez and Chan to a total layman! Chan 2nd and Fernandez 8th or 9th, that might be easier to explain - better spins, better footwork, cleaner jumps. But 17 places?
Ok i haven't watched either Chan or Fernandez yet but i watched them on the GP, and seriously Medusa - if you can't tell the difference between their skating and what puts them 17 places apart - then that explains a lot of your post
Do you think Fernandez should have beaten chan based on his one more triple?
Also - you are aware that that the "technical" is not all jumps right? It also includes steps and spins. When checking the PCS did you miss than Chan also had nearly 15 points on him in the element score?
And the bit in bold explains it all doesn't it - what made chan better than Fernandez...hmmm...well let me see - his jumps were better (despite fernandez landing one more than him), his spins and footwork were harder and better, he skates faster, with greater flow, uses the ice surface more, his choreogrpahy is more complex, quicker and cleaner, he interpets the music he uses instead of having it as background noise, his program is full of intricate and difficult transitions and most movements and elements are finished and polished.
So in short he's a better skater in every way.
Whether the difference between the two is 17 places, 6 places, or 450 places. That argument no longer has anything to do with how the two skated against each other but how the skaters in between them also performed. Just because their jump count was nearly identical that doesn't mean that's all that is looked at.
Ant