
I think the skaters have been too prudent to be doing any vilifying ( that would be self-defeating) . That job falls to the press and us ( or those of us who are so minded ). The federations must have been pretty vocal behind the scenes , but have been generally pretty restrained in their statements to the press..which is also prudent.
The ISU ( well Mr.Cinquanta, at least ) has invited criticism by being unclear about what all they
have been considering . Before the nuclear situation became apparent, they were perfectly willing to send the skaters to Tokyo, in spite of what everyone knows about the danger of aftershocks following a quake that large..Next, they appeared to write off any idea of an early relocation ( anything before October would be impossible)...now he says the Russian and American offers are under consideration , or among the solutions being considered.
Skatefiguring makes a good point about goal setting. Given the way Speedy's utterances have evolved , the ISU may be gradually ( perhaps reluctantly ) modifying it's original goal. If it can be modified, that implies that the original goal had a lot more to do with financial considerations than is strictly necessary to insure that the event occurs within the competitive year. ( Which has surely got to be part of their mandate)
So I ask, would we be seeing this possible change in attitude if some federations had not made direct offers, or like Canada, said that they could do it if called upon ? I rather doubt it. Of course it's also possible that everyone is being strung along , and these offers are not under real consideration .Tomorrow or Tuesday should tell. But if they say none of the proposed options are possible , they should have to explain to the skaters, the federations, and even the great unwashed public , why not.
Mathman's post adds another chilling wrinkle.. I'm not keen on the WTT concept , but heaven knows the ISU is always on the lookout for another cash cow.