The Judging Controversy Thread | Page 76 | Golden Skate

The Judging Controversy Thread

The tech caller (who was Russian) didn't call Adelina on anything. He failed either intentionally or accidentally (and my suspicions make me think its the former), and should never be allowed to be a tech caller again, IMO.

By tech caller are you referring to the technical controller or the technical specialist? And what is the role of each?
 
Exactly. They keep repeating ad hominem without any kind of rebuttal to the evidence presented.

I still can't figure out what jump Adelina did after the flutz in her supposed 3Lz-3T.

.gif here: http://112.imagebam.com/download/0t...309674741/adelinasotnikova_sochi_FS_3Lz3T.gif

It looks A LOT like the "3T" that Kimmi Meissner used to do in her triple-triple combos. I forget what the name of the toe variation is called, but I thought Kimmie used to get hit for it after 2006..
 
Just a quick off-topic question: Is it allowed or banned to hotlink an image in this forum? I see the option in the posting tool box, but haven't seen anyone posting images.
 
Under any system, whatever the judges are "looking for" (favoring), sometimes the x skater who has a bigger advantage in x than the y skater has in y.

Jumps vs. artistry is a major oversimplification, but for shorthand as an example, sometimes the better jumper had a big jump advantage and the better artist has a smaller artistic advantage. Other times the better artist has the bigger advantage and the jumper's margin on the jumps is narrower.

Some judges may give more weight to X and others to Y. Changes in the rules or the scoring system or the referee's instructions may cause the same judge to weight X more highly at one competition and Y at the next. And, yes, which country the X skater and the Y skater happen to represent each time might improperly influence how heavily a judge weights X vs. Y.

Which is why the commentary is disingenuous. After Scott and Sandra said Yuna's skating was so much more mature, did they question the curiously small 0.09 difference in the components scores? No? And as many people have been trying to point out, the large difference in technical score came from excessive grade of execution differences and lack of scrutiny on Adelina's jumps. Did they EVER bring up these points? No? They offered no analysis whatsoever, except to whitewash and justify the results.

It's not like they only had a couple minutes on the broadcast. They were on the air late-night recap, and again spoke on the scoring several times the following couple of days on NBC. They had more than enough time to go over the results, but instead the impression one gets from listening to Scott in particular, is that he's so used to the systemic corruption and politicking involved in figure skating, that it's second nature to him. "It is what it is", those are the results, here let's come up with some bs explanation after the fact, and move on to the next competition.

Except this time, the public does not accept the results or legitimacy of the scores.


So maybe Kurt is a better commentator than Scott? So what? Neither of them controls the results.

Which skater they each prefer, or how much they question or agree with the results on air, has no bearing on the results either. Learn what you can from what they have to say -- which is not much because their on-air comments are limited in time and directed toward the casual viewers -- and if you want to keep track you can add their expressed opinions about who should have won to a tally of North American TV commentators and skating experts as to whether they agree with the result or not.

None of that tells you whether the judges on the panel that day judged fairly or not. Maybe they did, maybe they didn't, but whether Kurt or Scott agrees with them has no bearing on that question.

It's not a question of quality. A lot of us think Scott talks too much and at inappropriate times during skates. That's a different issue.

In this case, you can tell Kurt Browning spoke what was honestly on his mind. You can tell Scott Hamilton was trying to make the results palatable, scrutiny be damned. That's why I take issue with his commentary. Not because he agreed or disagreed with the results. If he honestly thought Adelina should win, he's free to be in the small minority outside of Russia. But that's not the problem a lot of us have with his commentary.
 
After Scott and Sandra said Yuna's skating was so much more mature, did they question the curiously small 0.09 difference in the components scores?

Actually he did. To paraphrase, although he said Yuna was more polished, Adelina's met all the PCS requirements to earn a high score, and he said this after a review of what was measured.
 
By tech caller are you referring to the technical controller or the technical specialist? And what is the role of each?

Lakernik (the controller) and Baranova, the assistant, can overrule Gusmeroli the caller, with a majority opinion. From the USFS Website:

TECHNICAL PANEL - Consists of five people that work as a team and have direct communication with each other in running the new ISU judging system. These positions include a technical controller, a technical specialist, assistant technical specialist, data operator and a video replay operator. All final decisions made on elements and levels will be made from the majority opinion of the first three technical positions.

It's funny, because Adelina was the only one to get level 4 on both step sequences at this event. Wasn't there a big hub-bub made at CoR with the level discrepancies as well?
 
If I were Korean and had any role to play in 2018 Olympic, I would make sure the Russians would receive the same treatment that Yuna received in Sochi.

Same treatment.

No, this is not correct. That's why people who KNOW the competition was fixed HAVE to speak out. Or at least demand an investigation. I'm sure there are former skaters who are suspicious at a minimum, but would rather the whole thing blow over in order to save their sport. That is morally wrong. Some other girl will be cheated at some other competition. Other people will feel the need to take revenge. People who are clean will feel temptation to cheat in order to keep up, and some of them will yield to that temptation.

It's an evil cycle that must be broken. It hurts to rip off the bandage, but that's what needs to be done in this case. The sport is a joke because people don't take the scoring seriously.
 
It looks A LOT like the "3T" that Kimmi Meissner used to do in her triple-triple combos. I forget what the name of the toe variation is called, but I thought Kimmie used to get hit for it after 2006..

Yah I can't tell whether her blade took off first or her toe pick hit the ice first. Heh.
 
No, this is not correct. That's why people who KNOW the competition was fixed HAVE to speak out. Or at least demand an investigation. I'm sure there are former skaters who are suspicious at a minimum, but would rather the whole thing blow over in order to save their sport. That is morally wrong. Some other girl will be cheated at some other competition. Other people will feel the need to take revenge. People who are clean will feel temptation to cheat in order to keep up, and some of them will yield to that temptation.

It's an evil cycle that must be broken. It hurts to rip off the bandage, but that's what needs to be done in this case. The sport is a joke because people don't take the scoring seriously.
I agree. I did not mean to advocate this evil cycle. My comment was meant to be degrading to those who advocate such. (You know who you are)

P.S. Does anyone know if hotlinking images is OK or not?
 
Adelina received wrong edge calls in 16 out of 19 competitioins she participated. It's too transparent to ignore what has happened here and the 3 competitions where she did not get called out. My guess? Those 3 competitions had tech callers named something like "Olga," "Putina," "Stalina," etc. And in this competition we had an Olga and an Alexander.

BTW, is there any way to figure out who the tech panel was in those competitions? The ISU site is lacking.
 
Lakernik (the controller) and Baranova, the assistant, can overrule Gusmeroli the caller, with a majority opinion.

Yes... but you said this: "The tech caller (who was Russian) didn't call Adelina on anything. He failed either intentionally or accidentally (and my suspicions make me think its the former), and should never be allowed to be a tech caller again, IMO."

When in fact he and the assistant technical specialist would have to overrule Vanessa's calls together, which is quite a different thing than saying "he didn't call Adelina on anything".
 
Yes... but you said this: "The tech caller (who was Russian) didn't call Adelina on anything. He failed either intentionally or accidentally (and my suspicions make me think its the former), and should never be allowed to be a tech caller again, IMO."

When in fact he and the assistant technical specialist would have to overrule Vanessa's calls together, which is quite a different thing than saying "he didn't call Adelina on anything".

Whatever, you KNOW what i was intimating. Either Gusmeroli missed it, and they failed to correct it, or Gusmeroli called it, and they over-ruled her. Either way, they failed at their jobs.
 
Whatever, you KNOW what i was intimating. Either Gusmeroli missed it, and they failed to correct it, or Gusmeroli called it, and they over-ruled her. Either way, they failed at their jobs.

Even assuming the tech panel was "in on it", the nine judges gave Adelina the GOE and PCS to place her well ahead of Yuna. The reason I find the accusations implausible is because at least six of the judges and at least two of the tech panel had to be "up to no good" here. I feel like the fans don't like the result and are trying desperately to come up with a narrative to fit the conspiracy theory, but statistically a large majority (at least 2/3) of the decision makers would have to be part of this scheme for the result to happen.
 
I agree. Quite the coincidence that the CBC broadcasters expressed their shock and disgust. So did the Brits, Italians, Germans, all of them. Curious that the U.S. commentators seemed to be bias in favor of the Russians, especially after the reports from Le'Equipe earlier in the games. Also interesting to note that one other skater besides the two Russians had suspect scores in the ladies individual event -- Gracie Gold.



First, the judges meet beforehand and discuss judging. If there was a "bloc" of judges trying to influence the results, their persuasion could have factored in, and other judges may have been timid to score very far outside of what most of the other judges would be likely to score. It's interesting that most independent experts viewed Yuna as the clearly more artistic and refined, polish skater (even if they were loathe to protest the placement) ... but the PCS scores were essentially the same. How can you not find that egregious and suspect?

Second, from a more statistic point of view ... let's look at deviations from the mean and mode scores for each skater. Where is Mathman? I haven't taken statistics classes in years. I'd have to really put in some effort to give a good mathematical breakdown, whereas he and some other posters could probably type something credible on a whim.



I didn't assume anything, I clearly said most people seem to think the casual internet evidence is inconclusive on the edge call. Everyone seems convinced the 3T should have been downgraded, including me.

You conveniently did not address the issue with the Russian tech callers and Adelina's 16 of 19 statistic.



1. No traveling spin should ever receive a +3. I haven't gone back and looked at Julia's skate, because it was awful and she didn't place, but at Euros and Team competition I saw her travel many times and receive +3s

2. Her jumps should NEVER receive higher than +1. Never under any circumstances. +2 is egregious ... to be getting +3 on her jumps is outright criminal.



Me either, I don't know enough about steps, but from what I've heard Adelina's footwork is not on par with Yuna's. I can only go off the deviation from their mode scores, and in particular how Adelina is not known as a footwork artist but was the only one to score level 4 in both programs. At the very least it draws further scrutiny, and the people who know more than me think the levels are wrong.

-----

You also ignored the short program, where the two should not have been tied.

Stop with the harping about Yulia traveling.
Euro's SP: no traveling on any of the spins, last one perfectly centered
Euro's LP: no traveling on any of the spins, last one perfectly centered
Team Event SP: no traveling on any but the final position after the required element of the spin were completed so the judges are not required to remove GOE. She finished what she had to do before traveling, some people might have decided that the traveling negated all the required portion but thankfully they didn't, just like the judges would not remove GOE from a jump if the skater fell after maintaining their landing edge for a few seconds and then tripped when going forward.
Team LP: all but the last spin were perfectly centered, on the last one she struggled with final position, never getting it solid. Normal GOE: 1.36-1.50 GOE received: 1.00 She was penalized exactly as she should be.
Olympic SP: no traveling on first two spins, minor wavering on first position, final position completely centered GOE 1.36 instead of 1.50
Olympic LP: no traveling on any of the spins, final one perfectly solid GOE 1.50

GOE for her final spin.
When solid and completely centered 1.50
When solid but travels a bit, after the required rotation was completed or slightly unstable on one posotion 1.36-1.43
When the spin is still very good, but traveled right away on final position 1.00


Adelina regularly gets (including at Euro's a month ago) a maximum TES of 37 points and PCS of 33.5 points for a total of 71.5, now she suddenly gets 39, and 35.5, just enough to tie with the leaders who had greater technical difficulty and a total of 75?

And she regularly got (including at Euro's a month ago) a maximum of 62 TES points, granted she had a couple of technical mistakes, and PCS of 69 for a total of 131. Her typical GOE for her well-executed solo 2Axel and 3Flip was 1.74, for example. Now suddenly she gets 75.5 TES and 74.5 components for a total of 150? In what crazy world is that not a red flag for everyone involved? And for those two elements her combined GOE jumped to 2.57. She changed some of her elements around so its harder to objectively compare them but even for her spins her GOE rose wildly. Her spins and steps at Euros were Level 4,3,1, and 3 respectively. At the games they were Level 4,4,4, and 4 respectively. Not only did the levels increase her BV from by 1.4 points,but the GOE rose by 1.41. All of these are small increases but between all the Levels being called by the Russian tech panel and the concentrated efforts of even 2 judges consistently marking Adelina higher and Yuna lower in all GOE and components especially in the FS it's possible to have changed the results by a good 7-8 points including both the SP and LP.

And for drivingmissdaisy if Adelina has been getting the 4th of 5th best PCS, including at Euros a month ago, what suddenly changed in a month that her PCS deserved to be the best in the world?
 
Even assuming the tech panel was "in on it", the nine judges gave Adelina the GOE and PCS to place her well ahead of Yuna. The reason I find the accusations implausible is because at least six of the judges and at least two of the tech panel had to be "up to no good" here. I feel like the fans don't like the result and are trying desperately to come up with a narrative to fit the conspiracy theory, but statistically a large majority (at least 2/3) of the decision makers would have to be part of this scheme for the result to happen.

Well, the controller was in the Russian fed, the assistant was a Fin... and we know Sotnikova had at least two judges (one of whom had been kicked out in 1998). So I find the accusations a bit more plausible than you. The Russian Fed has been known to (and been caught) doing this stuff before. The reason I don't think it was Gusmeroli, is because the French didn't get any help this Olympics from anyone.

All of the judges may not have been in on it directly, but I'm SURE the Russian fed and their allies were trying to persuade and politick at the very least. I think many (including you) are being rather naive about the state of judging in Figure Skating. This was a pre-ordained result, at least on of the Russian teens was getting a medal, it just happened to be Adelina because Julia fell.
 
And for drivingmissdaisy if Adelina has been getting the 4th of 5th best PCS, including at Euros a month ago, what suddenly changed in a month that her PCS deserved to be the best in the world?

Second best. Mao skated early and had lower PCS than a few other girls, almost as low as Gracie. Carolina's LP choreography was made less intricate to improve her stamina later in the program. Adelina skated the program of her life. That is how she leap-frogged those two on that particular night.
 
Back
Top