(The GOE academy thread didn't get a lot of attention. Feel free to revive it if interested, taking account of recent rule changes)
I'm more interested in discussing program components -- lots of room for discussion because each component has multiple criteria, there's lots of room for honest disagreement, and for some of them not technical skating knowledge is less important than performing arts knowledge and even personal reactions, so nonskaters can join right in.
See the Program Components Overview and Program Components With Explanations PDFs linked at the bottom of this page (or near the bottom of this one).
I'd like to use some examples of pre-IJS programs so that there are no wrong or right answers. Let's discuss among ourselves and if we end up assigning scores we can make our own Golden Skate "corridor."
Please suggest some programs that would be interesting to analyze.
Let's start discussion with the Interpretation component.
ISU program components training videos on Interpretation
What else should be considered in evaluating this component?
I'm more interested in discussing program components -- lots of room for discussion because each component has multiple criteria, there's lots of room for honest disagreement, and for some of them not technical skating knowledge is less important than performing arts knowledge and even personal reactions, so nonskaters can join right in.
See the Program Components Overview and Program Components With Explanations PDFs linked at the bottom of this page (or near the bottom of this one).
I'd like to use some examples of pre-IJS programs so that there are no wrong or right answers. Let's discuss among ourselves and if we end up assigning scores we can make our own Golden Skate "corridor."
Please suggest some programs that would be interesting to analyze.
Let's start discussion with the Interpretation component.
Interpretation
Definition: The personal and creative translation of the music to movement on ice.
To reward the skater who through movement creates a personal and creative translation of the music.
As the tempo binds all notes in time, the ability to use the tempos and rhythms of the music in a variety of ways, along with the subtle use of finesse to reflect the nuances of all the fundamentals of music: melody, rhythm, harmony, color, texture, and form creates a mastery of interpretation.
Criteria:
Effortless Movements in Time to the Music (Timing) Note: Timing is a separate component in Compulsory Dances.
The ability to translate music through sureness of rhythm, tempo, effective movement, and effortless flow over the ice surface by: rhythmic continuity, awareness of all tempo/rhythm changes in a variety of ways.
Expression of the music’s style, character, and rhythm
Maintaining the character and style of the music throughout the entire program by use of body and skating techniques to depict a mood, style, shape, or thematic idea as motivated by the structure of the music: melody, harmony, rhythm, color, texture, and form. The total involvement of the body and being should express the intent of the music.
Use of finesse to reflect the nuances of music.
Finesse is the skater’s refined, artful manipulation of nuances. Nuances are the personal, artistic ways of bringing subtle variations to the intensity, tempo, and dynamics of the music made by the composer and/or the musician.
Relationship between the partners reflecting the character of the music.
Interpretive unison is an equal partnership with the same degree of sensitivity between partners not only to the music, but also to the equal understanding of the music’s nuances. There is an intimacy between the partners that is characterized by a feeling of “surrender” to the music and possibly to each other that creates an entity greater than the two of them.
Appropriateness of music (original dance and free dance)
ISU program components training videos on Interpretation
What else should be considered in evaluating this component?