Didn't look much like a Weir costume to me. It's not the most subtle look, but I think it's pretty good. The color palette is nice, and it's not well-feathered.Did Joubert borrow a costume from Weir?
I don't think he would. Kozuka's got a higher TES in the FS: 82.68 without the quad, vs Chan's 79.80. It hasn't helped much.If Kozuka had landed his quad, he would have won...
I don't think he would. Kozuka's got a higher TES in the FS: 82.68 without the quad, vs Chan's 79.80. It hasn't helped much.
Well, consider me a pessimist, then.Yes, Kozuka would have won. Kozuka got only 1 point for his quad attempt... And really 0 if you count the automatic deduction. With the Quad you can add in a 9.8 to Kozuka's score and he most certainly would have beaten Chan. I believe Kozuka would have won the long if he had done a double axel.
So what are the final results for this?
Yes, Kozuka would have won. Kozuka got only 1 point for his quad attempt... And really 0 if you count the automatic deduction. With the Quad you can add in a 9.8 to Kozuka's score and he most certainly would have beaten Chan. I believe Kozuka would have won the long if he had done a double axel.
I completely agree. Other than name value, I can't understand why the judges hold back on Kozuka, yet be so generous towards Chan.I would have given the win to Kozuka. But it could have gone both ways - and the judges gave it to Chan. They are both incredible skaters, I prefer Kozuka's edging and speed though - I think his skating skills are a bit superior to Chan's. Chan's musical expression is excellent on the other hand. Interesting that both their 3As, in Kozuka's case the 3A-3T, got +2 GOE. Chan's Axel was solid, but I didn't think that it deserved a +2. Then again Joubert also got a +2 on his second 3A, and that wasn't that superior either. GOE was a bit generous I think, a bit like 4CC 2008.
Medusa, thanks for your recaps - they were great! In fact, without Eurosport (snooker again :scowl I'm happy to have had you to provide commentary - and like them, I think you've managed to find the good in everyone while also being critical were needed.I am back from Paris! It was sooooo amazing. Where do I start. Oh yes, Préaubert. The audience went wild for him - and his program was fantastic. I was sitting there thinking all the time, "oh no, on the next jump he will fall" - but it didn't happen. His PCS was very low I thought, I think he got hit by the KVDP curse, the judges won't give good PCS - even if he lands all the jumps. And he is a very nice guy and I even got his autograph after the skate, despite loads of people trying to get a photo with him etc. - he was very patient.
I would have given the win to Kozuka. But it could have gone both ways - and the judges gave it to Chan. They are both incredible skaters, I prefer Kozuka's edging and speed though - I think his skating skills are a bit superior to Chan's. Chan's musical expression is excellent on the other hand. Interesting that both their 3As, in Kozuka's case the 3A-3T, got +2 GOE. Chan's Axel was solid, but I didn't think that it deserved a +2. Then again Joubert also got a +2 on his second 3A, and that wasn't that superior either. GOE was a bit generous I think, a bit like 4CC 2008.
Joubert seemed tired and hesitant to me. The program has enormous potential, but he didn't seem on the top of his game. But my lack of enthusiasm for Brian's program and performance may have something to do with Alban bringing the house down with Kalinka and a close to perfect performance right before Joubert took the ice. And what was with the 2As? I get it that he didn't try the 3F because of the looming edge call - but why didn't he repeat a 3Lz? Or tried to tack on a 3T somewhere? Joubert didn't repeat two Triples, he left out the Triple Toe and the Triple Flip and screwed up the Loop. At least he still can do a 3A...
Well, nevertheless it was a fantastic afternoon with the guys! It was great to see the two boy wonders live, but the highlight for me was definitely Préaubert's performance.