Um ... actually,
Brennan didn't write that sentence anywhere in the article. That sentence only appears when you hover over the link to the article. I've been a newspaper columnist, and while I don't think Brennan's editor would have given the link that "headline," it's possible that the online marketing dept. might have. The actual newspaper headline is "Cue Up Drama, Intrigue for U.S. Figure Skating Nationals."
I've read the article three times, searching for that sentence in Christine Brennan's narrative. It isn't there. And the sentiment isn't there either.
This makes me wonder about all the people quoted above (except drivingmissdaisy) who expressed outrage about the sentence and the writer. It makes me think that R.D., FarrisFan, and Amei didn't even bother to read the article first, before condemning it ... and at the same time
spreading untruths that reflect badly on Ashley.
Brennan is actually making the point that the committees have been given flexibility. She's pointing out that, in consideration of who will make the best impact for another US medal, in addition to a men's medal and a dance medal ... a team medal ... they may be looking at (for example) 1. those who are a known quantity, and 2. those who have proven that they can stand up to the pressure of skating for the team, not just themselves, and 3. other factors... I won't repeat the whole article.
I am flabbergasted that people will use this as an opportunity to drum up sentiment against Ashley when they haven't even read the article. Nothing should surprise me anymore around here in this respect. But it still does.
Here's a lovely paragraph from the article: (p.s. it's a good article.)