LOL
have you EVER read the rules??? maybe even once?
if you read you would never write such a nonsense....
:disapp:
Have you? Which part of the rules give +2 and +3 GOE for those sequence?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL
have you EVER read the rules??? maybe even once?
if you read you would never write such a nonsense....
:disapp:
Okey, I guess we'll agree to disagree...Thing is I did and more than once. I agree with the levels but just not the GOEs, especially on effortless throughout, good acceleration and deep edges and turns. Without those, I can't see how it can enhance the musical structure throughout. +1 or 2 but certainly not 2,3s throughout.

LOL
have you EVER read the rules??? maybe even once?
if you read you would never write such a nonsense....
:disapp:
yes. I know rules.Have you? Which part of the rules give +2 and +3 GOE for those sequence?
I don't remember anything about Ashley's programs. How many events has she done this year?
yes. I know rules.
Even if you don't agree with all of bullets. She easily can get 6 bullets for +3
FOR + 1 : 2 bullets FOR + 2 : 4 bullets FOR + 3 : 6 or more bullets
1) good energy and execution + yes
2) good speed or acceleration during sequence + yes
3) use of various steps during the sequence + yes maybe even too many
4) deep clean edges (including entry and exit of all turns) + yes very clean edges
5) good control and commitment of the whole body maintaining accuracy of steps + yes Perfect control
6) creativity and originality +/- not the best but still interesting
7) effortless throughout + YES YES - one of the best lightness and flawless from ALL elements
8) element enhances the musical structure. + yes - very musical. I can not like her FS music but she synchronized beautifully to that music.
I don't remember anything about Ashley's programs. How many events has she done this year?
I remember her SP at Nationals was painful to look at, all those head-shakings and shimmy shoulders etc. I just can't with it.
And her FS, it wasn't bad, but someone else did a much better Exogenesis (Sergei Voronov:luv17![]()
I really liked her SP the first time I saw it, but after repeat viewings it fell flat for me because I started to really notice all the empty choreography and two footed skating. The sass captured my interest the first time around but after that it started to feel cheesy.

She. :taunt:He obviously is![]()
She. :taunt:
And she is obviously talking about Evgenia. :handw:
edited :agree:There's no denying Evgenia's TES but GOEs and PCS can overcome TES differences to an extent. Carolina is also working with Mishin so I expect her to be getting better. But really, who knows what will happen. At least last year I didn't expect the order of the top 3 after the SP.
Some speculate that clean Osmond can beat Medvedeva but I don't see her being clean and if that was the case (very unlikely) I still would not expect her to out-point Medvedeva if Medvedeva is cleanish. So it's wishful thinking but I obviously would love to see two strong skates from Kaetlyn even if my personal faves would be in danger - like Anna.I'm starting to think that I'll only be able to believe in Carolina as a possible medalist when I see her lutz![]()
I am looking forward to some unexpected / bewildering outcomes & plot twists

I won't ask for much, I just hope to see at least one of my favorite 3Lz-3T ladies pull off a clean SP. Wakaba, Karen, or Alaine. Any one of them will do. Please. Is that too much to ask.![]()
Do you mean Chartrand? Because she won't be at Worlds. She finished third at Canadian Nats to Kaetlyn and Gabby.
