What? They only found Shibs as example? I was curious why their score go up to Virtue/Moir level suddenly. That must be why since ISU judges thinks If ISU made video it must be good. I remembered 2011, ISU tried to explain their judges ''clean skating'' is not mean ''quality skating'' after Shibs bronze medal scandal. After all those things they begin 2012 where they belong.
Shibs have poor ice covarage than their rivals. I'm not counting Virtue/Moir and Papadakis/Cizeron as their rivals of course. Teams like Bobrova/Soloviev, Weaver/Poje have better ice covarage, also have more speed. Other teams use more variation of speed which shows their skating skills better. Shiutanis shallow edges and curveless turns often results as level2 If there is not American/Canadian specialist on the panel. After 4CC, I don't think they will get level4s like candy from canadian specialists anymore. Who is going to be in technical panel for Worlds by the way?
The iSU video was short and made several years ago but did not include any examples of quality edgework other than the Shibs, which does not necessarily mean that they are the ONLY team to exhibit quality edgework. Your opinion is just that, not fact. No team exhibits total perfection every time they compete, which is often why tech scores can vary from competition to competition. So if a team gets a Level 2 in one event, that does not mean that they can't get a Level 4 in another. You can't always blame the technical score on bias.