MTM 2.0's strategy has always been to be perfect...
what was lacking before was the twist and confidence in lifts which seems MUCH improved before... they have always had strong jumps and throws.
What could set them back is their low BV because they do not attempt the hardest elements but the ISU made sure they wanted quality over difficulty in pairs... and that's always been MTM2.0's thing so I say why not GPF for them???
what was lacking before was the twist and confidence in lifts which seems MUCH improved before... they have always had strong jumps and throws.
What could set them back is their low BV because they do not attempt the hardest elements but the ISU made sure they wanted quality over difficulty in pairs... and that's always been MTM2.0's thing so I say why not GPF for them???