2021-2022 US Women's Figure Skating | Page 103 | Golden Skate

2021-2022 US Women's Figure Skating

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is exactly why the selection procedure will never change in a substantive way. The backroomers will never give up their power to a bunch of numbers.
I do think having tiers to rank the skaters is a notable improvement, especially because it formally establishes the importance of consistent scores in international events. Looking at the chart, I think more women could end up in tier 3 than there are available Olympic/World spots, so it'll be interesting to see how things shake out if that happens.
 
Statistically, none of the individual criteria can boast overwhelming success as a predictor. Sometimes the favoites dominate the O;ympics, sometimes a relative newcomer shines.

Exactly. In an interview this week, Max Trankov was asked if there were secrets to peaking at the Olympics at the right time. He pretty much said no one has figured it out yet, because there are examples both ways, of doing great all season and not so well at Olympics, or having challenges earlier in the season, then winning Olympics. Examples were of himself with Tatyana, and Aljona/Robin.

"We started the Olympic season powerfully, set new world records in both short and free skating in Oberstdorf. We had a great series of Grand Prix, but really did not perform in the best way in the Grand Prix finals and at the European Championships. Only the Olympics are special competitions, and no one has yet been able to tune in to them."

 
But then, they wouldn't be using nationals of the previous season, and worlds of the previous season for the primary tier of BoW. 😅 If we are to test Olympic preparation using the criterion you suggest, the most weight should be given to the American women who make the GPF this season! (ETA: Meaning, if the primary focus were to be on the Russian skaters who are possibly going to be competing in the Olympics, then the most focus would be on GPF, and probably also the fields of the individual GPs for that matter, whenever relevant. Yet, we see GPF 2021 being lumped together with 2021 Worlds, and 2022 Nationals, and also see 2021 Nationals has some weight)
Not sure I understood all this but I wasnt suggesting any specific criteria. Simply saying that using a body of work including important international events makes more sense than going off a single performance at Nationals. Yes theres a lot of pressure at Nationals and how one performs there is very relevant. But its also the competition that least resembles the Olympics. If Alysa wins all her challengers, medals at both GP events, makes the final, but has a rough showing and comes 4th at Nationals...and lets say Karen/Mariah/Amber bomb their challenger events, dont medal on the GP, but pull it together enough to get 3rd at Nationals...to me theres just no way you can say whoever is on the podium at Nationals makes the team, too bad Alysa.
 
Last edited:
Not sure I understood all this but I wasnt suggesting any specific criteria. Simply saying that using a body of work including important international events makes more sense than going off a single performance at Nationals. Yes theres a lot of pressure at Nationals and how one performs there is very relevant. But its also the competition that least resembles the Olympics. If Alysa wins all her challengers, medals at both GP events, makes the final, but comes 4th at Nationals...and lets say Karen/Mariah/Amber bomb their challenger events, dont medal on the GP, but pull it together enough to get 3rd at Nationals...to me theres just no way you can say whoever is on the podium at Nationals makes the team, too bad Alysa.
I was saying that the US body of work emphasizes two events that don't take into account the Olympic field of Russian ladies, as you were suggesting. So if you argue that Nationals isn't the most important because it doesn't have the toughest Olympic contenders in the world, then we can say the US criteria still failed, because it takes into account Worlds 2021 (last season, not the Olympic season, with the refreshed Olympic field) and US Nationals 2022, and places it on the same level as GPF 2021 - which is where the bulk of that will come in.

So, basically my point is, if the US wished to emphasise experience against Russian ladies, then it still should be considered a failure, not a success. I wouldn't defend this BoW if I were saying such an experience matters more than the pressure at nationals, anyway.
 
Want to go to the Olympics? Prove it by finishing Top 3 at Nationals.
That is an attractive way to answer the question, for the reason that it is an actual answer rather than mumbo-jumbo. (On the other hand, an equally firm position might be, "Want to go the the Olympics? Prove it by dominating the Grand Prix cricuit or winning Four Continents against international competition.")

I think that everyone agrees, including the USFSA, that placement at Nationals is the number one qualifier, with everything elase secondary. But DrivingMissDaisy makes a point, too. The "Nationals is all" tack puts pressure on the federation and the judges at Nationals to make sure that the results "come out right." Another point of view woluld be, "If you win Nationals your reward is that you are the national figure skating champion -- no questions asked." Now let's take up the separate question of who is out best bet at the Olympics.
 
So, basically my point is, if the US wished to emphasise experience against Russian ladies, then it still should be considered a failure, not a success. I wouldn't defend this BoW if I were saying such an experience matters more than the pressure at nationals, anyway.
Ok, I understand what you meant now. I wasn't necessarily saying to emphasize competitions against Russian ladies. Just that if someone if someone bombs all their international assignments and only skates well in the "comfort" of their home country, this is not a great indicator that they will do well at the Olympics. However I do also think that this year's GP and Nationals should weigh more heavily than how they did at Worlds last year.
 
Last edited:
Not sure I understood all this but I wasnt suggesting any specific criteria. Simply saying that using a body of work including important international events makes more sense than going off a single performance at Nationals. Yes theres a lot of pressure at Nationals and how one performs there is very relevant. But its also the competition that least resembles the Olympics. If Alysa wins all her challengers, medals at both GP events, makes the final, but has a rough showing and comes 4th at Nationals...and lets say Karen/Mariah/Amber bomb their challenger events, dont medal on the GP, but pull it together enough to get 3rd at Nationals...to me theres just no way you can say whoever is on the podium at Nationals makes the team, too bad Alysa.
I wrote earlier that I'd helped get the discussion off-topic and vowed to step away, but this is about current ladies in the current year, so I'm back in. This is on topic.

To respond to your comment, I'd have no difficulty at all accepting this outcome. Yes, it would be "too bad, Alysa."

I never like situations that remove power from the athletes and put it in a committee's hands. Maybe in your example, Karen/Mariah/Amber have struggled beforehand because of confidence issues, undisclosed minor injuries, new coaching team, more sophisticated choreography... whatever... but they've overcome those and are on a definite rise. And maybe Alysa would be on a downward trajectory from her previous performances and her poor Nationals showing is a preview of coming attractions at the Olympics... who knows.

The ideal situation is that the eventual Olympic Team skates well throughout the season, improving mastery of technique and artistry and confidence that will propel them through a wonderful Nationals and a solid podium finish. Then the Team selection will be a no-brainer.
 
Just that if someone if someone bombs all their international assignments and only skates well in the "comfort" of their home country, this is not a great indicator that they will do well at the Olympics.
This part I agree with, and I bring that up in one of my posts. It's one of those things, where it's very much unclear and best to be left up to "the committee" - but only in particularly borderline circumstances. Do remember that Nationals in an Olympic season is where a lot of the competitors want to peak, and it does have tons of pressure. Every-four-year fans are also watching. Chance is gone, won't come back for another 4 years. This isn't present in the other events of the season (apart from the Olympics, of course). You bomb a GP, you won't make GPF. Might as well wait for Nationals, it's OK. And it's also possible they had physical issues earlier in the season, or going for a particularly good Olympic-quality program (which might have caused such an inconsistency), and so on. Again, subjectivity, which we can only argue over. (For example, I disagree with TontoK, if it's a particularly borderline case between Alysa in 4th and whoever's in 3rd. OTOH, if it's Alysa landing two triples at such a huge event, then meh at her this time)
 
4CCs are held in January, like US nationals. Olympics in February. The 4CCs are held a week or so after Nationals, actually. The problem isn't the time to make the decision, rather the time between the two events, and then the Olympics right afterwards.

Absolutely not. What I'm saying is that "Currently" Alysa is our best hope for a medal of Any color. I know she has tried quads but, has she ever landed one in competition? With her 3A and improved PCS, I'm hoping she will be a medal threat. Isabeau and Lindsay give me confidence that our future is in good hands.
She has landed quads in competition. She had a consistent quad lutz--though not always fully rotated--before the pandemic.
 
That is exactly why the selection procedure will never change in a substantive way. The backroomers will never give up their power to a bunch of numbers.
This right here sums it all up quite nicely. The suits like having this power.

It‘s not that hard to come up with a system to quantify performance. You give more weight to the National championships and international events with top ranked skaters, so a good result where you faced Kaori, Rika, and Anna S is worth more than winning against lower level competition.

The Ryder Cup in golf manages to have a merit based points system that’s transparent and the rankings are readily available.

Here is a question. Does the committee get replaced if their selections end up wrong, or are these positions locked in and you keep them until you retire or die?
 
I think that everyone agrees, including the USFSA, that placement at Nationals is the number one qualifier, with everything elase secondary.
I think that may be the intent, but the way the tiers are worded, I don't think that's the case. Group 3 and 4 do not require a top 5 finish at Nationals. For example, Alysa has achieved a score that could put her in the top 5 at the Olympics, so she would meet the Group 3 requirement even if she placed last at Nationals since that group requires a Nationals medal OR a single high score OR a series of strong scores. If a junior like Isabeau medals at Nationals, there might only be two other eligible skaters in Group 3 or higher based on the Nationals result, so a last place finisher with one strong score could find her way on the team. This is a very unlikely scenario, but the criteria do not limit the selection pool to the top 5 finishers as it seems to at first glance.
 
This is another thing that bugs me about body of work. The Olympic Games have no bearing on the number of spots a federation earns for the following year. There's really no reason for Nationals not to serve as the Olympic Trials. Want to go to the Olympics? Prove it by finishing Top 3 at Nationals.

Although I still don't like it, there's more justification for a body of work argument for the WC team, where the results impact the next season.

I’ve heard the reason nationals doesn’t serve as Olympic trials has do with rights issues between USFS and USOC. ie that USFS would have to give up something major (money? broadcast rights? not sure) if nationals were the Olympic trials. Sorry I can’t recall exactly.
 
This is another thing that bugs me about body of work. The Olympic Games have no bearing on the number of spots a federation earns for the following year. There's really no reason for Nationals not to serve as the Olympic Trials. Want to go to the Olympics? Prove it by finishing Top 3 at Nationals.

Although I still don't like it, there's more justification for a body of work argument for the WC team, where the results impact the next season.
If the skaters that finish in the top three at Nationals this season are skaters that have a strong season, then they should definitely make the Olympic team.
 
It is still very on in the season. Even though Karen, Mariah, Amber, Bradie, and other strong skaters may not be showing a big spark in competition yet this season, it is still too early to say that some skaters may not make the Olympic team.
 
I wrote earlier that I'd helped get the discussion off-topic and vowed to step away, but this is about current ladies in the current year, so I'm back in. This is on topic.

To respond to your comment, I'd have no difficulty at all accepting this outcome. Yes, it would be "too bad, Alysa."

I never like situations that remove power from the athletes and put it in a committee's hands. Maybe in your example, Karen/Mariah/Amber have struggled beforehand because of confidence issues, undisclosed minor injuries, new coaching team, more sophisticated choreography... whatever... but they've overcome those and are on a definite rise. And maybe Alysa would be on a downward trajectory from her previous performances and her poor Nationals showing is a preview of coming attractions at the Olympics... who knows.

The ideal situation is that the eventual Olympic Team skates well throughout the season, improving mastery of technique and artistry and confidence that will propel them through a wonderful Nationals and a solid podium finish. Then the Team selection will be a no-brainer.
The thing with having nationals as the only qualifier is that it means the fed will massage the scores to give the chosen ones every chance to go. It would arguably be giving the committee more power rather than less because we can't forget that figure skating is a highly subjective sport.

The easiest way to decrease the effects of domestic score massaging is to let international assignments count for something. Would you rather see Alysa being held up on PCS and GOE for a messy performance or just take into account the scores that have been achieved throughout the season?
 
The thing with having nationals as the only qualifier is that it means the fed will massage the scores to give the chosen ones every chance to go. It would arguably be giving the committee more power rather than less because we can't forget that figure skating is a highly subjective sport.

The easiest way to decrease the effects of domestic score massaging is to let international assignments count for something. Would you rather see Alysa being held up on PCS and GOE for a messy performance or just take into account the scores that have been achieved throughout the season?
Honestly it seems to me that they should only take into account 1) US nationals, 2)GP series and 3)JGP series (points are pretty comparable). I would not take into account last years' Worlds-because, frankly, it was last year. In skating one year can mean a great deal as far as injuries, erosion of jumps etc. I think they are making this way more difficult then it needs to be. Because Bradie and Karen, IMO have a negligible ability to place highly, I would rather the team be all new skaters-give them the opportunity to compete in the Olympics. So Alysa, Amber, Mariah and maybe Lindsay. Alsya will place high enough so that it doesn't matter how they other two do. And we will probably get silver in the team competition no matter which of these girls are sent. For that matter, in the team competition might as well have Alysa skate both segments.
 
On the opposite hand, this is exactly why Ross Miner was not selected in 2018. he had one amazing competition at nationals with nothing else to back that up. he hadn't won an international medal in over 2 years and hadn't even been on the national podium in 5 years. he couldn't deliver when it counted. USFS couldn't count on him.
On a side note, this description is staaarting to sound like what Yaroslav is going through since last nationals...

And I obviously want to be very wrong on this.

*Back to the ladies*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top