Of course it does, I am one who has to be dragged to any event of any kind I can watch from the comfort of my favourite chair and laptop! But livestreams and such ain't gonna pay the rather large bills (it's a pricey sport for skaters and TPTB alike) especially since a lot of viewers expect their livestreams free or at least very inexpensive. Plus for the home audience, especially new or casual viewers, a packed and excited audience is always going to make watching more appealing than sparser ones (and godawful cheap-looking rink decor and yes I am looking at you Skate America). A competition/show that attracts a decent/big live audience also can do good things for the area's economy and businesses which makes them all the more willing to welcome figure skating back. Optics and money. can't get away from them: even video game championships seek and chase live audiences.
Clearly there is a distinct group of individuals who view a sport as a social experience or as someone posted elsewhere, "entertainment." And if an "excited" audience, as you put it, made it more appealing for purists like me, I wouldn't be shouting "shut the 'bleep' up!" when someone keeps screaming so loudly I have to ask, "Are they being murdered or assaulted in the stands?" I derive pleasure from watching reactions from skaters and their coaches rather than anything an audience is doing.
As for the rinks, well, when the cameras move around, that's when you can see the shabby venue as was the case at Grenoble. I was pleased when a couple years back it was announced the GPDF was moving from Grenoble, France to Angers IceParc. What a difference! Then it was announced the GPF was going to be held at Grenoble this year and I rolled my eyes at the ugliness of it all and wondered who would want to even sit at a crappy dive like Grenoble, after they saw skating events at Angers. If someone doesn't realize venue can be a deciding factor for purchasing/selling a ticket to a sporting event, I'd say they're out of touch with reality. Deeply. And the point for making my other post was, reducing an entire sport to how many tickets are sold for live events somehow being equal to its "popularity" is not something I will agree with.
Take golf for instance, there are only so many people who want to walk the distance of a golf course with the players to observe them playing and in no way really illustrates the popularity of the sport. Both of my parents were avid golfers but had no desire to partake in the three-ring circus at a golf event with a bunch of spectators. Now if I want to mention Tiger Woods, that's a game changer. A sport changer. A phenomenon that didn't just change the sport when he arrived, the sport was changed for the better, forever. Even when he wasn't playing. To this day, you can see how one man can make a sport "cool" that was never viewed that way since the sport's inception.
As for benefiting an economy, I'd tip my hat to the Olympics for doing that. It did wonders for USA's Salt Lake City—before, during, and years after. Recently, the powers-that-be in Salt Lake discussed it and how they are looking forward to hosting the Olympics again in 2034. But hosting a GP skating event in a crap town with a rundown venue will not be the same thing in any way or derive substantial benefit. That I won't buy.
